Project 311 Survey

Methods to Analyze LOPC Scenarios - Not Resulting from Process Deviations

1 Start 2 Complete

First Name *

Last Name *

Company *

E-mail Address *

How do you generally address loss-of-containment scenarios where the initiating cause is a random mechanical failure (residual failure) of a line or vessel; i.e., not due to a process deviation or an external force? (Choose all that apply) *

We specifically exclude them from HIRAs/PHAs

We include them in our HIRAs/PHAs but, since they nearly always get a “Remote” likelihood (or similar), they fall into our tolerable risk range.

We specifically exclude them from HIRAs/PHAs *

because they are considered to be fully managed by our asset integrity (mechanical integrity) program.

because we do not consider them to be amenable to analysis.

because we analyze and evaluate these scenarios as a part of a separate Facility Siting efforts

because...

because... (please specify) *

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Math question * 1 + 17 =

Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Other Sites & Tools

Technical Groups

Technical

Professional/Personal Growth

Societal Needs

Leadership

2025 Spring Meeting and 21st Global Congress on Process Safety

2025 AIChE Annual Meeting

Upcoming Conferences & Events

CEP: July 2025

CEP: June 2025

Explore Areas of Advancement:

Learning Center:

Want to be an Entrepreneur? Personal Stories From Three Successful Entrepreneurs Who Have Traveled This Path.

Project 311 Survey

Methods to Analyze LOPC Scenarios - Not Resulting from Process Deviations

You may also be looking for...

About

Member Organizations

Events

Become a Member

Education

Projects

Tools

Publications

Resources

CCPS Process Safety Beacon

Code of Conduct

Beware of Hotel and Attendee-list Scams