Academy Discounts

Get a 10% discount on all eLearning courses until November 29, 2020. Use code ELEARN10 at checkout.

The Techno-Economic Prospects of Using Piperazine for Carbon Dioxide Removal from Natural Gas

Source: AIChE
  • Type:
    Conference Presentation
  • Conference Type:
    AIChE Spring Meeting and Global Congress on Process Safety
  • Presentation Date:
    August 18, 2020
  • Duration:
    20 minutes
  • Skill Level:
  • PDHs:

Share This Post:

One technology used in the removal of carbon dioxide from natural gas is the absorption process, in which Alkanolamines are frequently used as solvents. Since the 1960’s and 70’s several Amines have come into general use, however, limited information has been reported in the literature concerning the Amine best suited to treat sweet natural gas. From the absorption rate point of view, primary or secondary amines (e.g. MEA) are preferred. However, in case the costs of regeneration are also taken into account, tertiary amines (e.g. DIPA) are much more attractive.

The core objective of this work is to evaluate the potential of using Piperazine against the most common Amines which are used nowadays. This article presents a novel investigations of the most significant effective parameters for processing Piperazine, and their influences on the plant efficiency and investment cost. And also has demonstrated that, choosing Piperazine (30%wt) could reduce more than 10% of the operating cost and 4% of the equipment cost in the Acid Gas Removal Unit against the other solvents.

Regarding the methodology, firstly six solvents had been identified to be investigated, then an acceptable range of concentrations (acceptable range of concentrations is that attain solvent stability, and reduce foaming tendency and corrosion rates of the solvent) for each solvent is defined. Next, a design of the facilities at each concentration for the six solvents are simulated using ASPEN HYSYS software. After that, the most economical concentration of each solvent is selected, and then the chosen concentrations are compared in performance and economic point of view.

Results show that Piperazine (30% wt.) is the most effective solvent, which performs Amine loading of 0.8 mol-CO2absorbed/mol-Amine at the specified operating conditions. Moreover it has preceded other alternatives in both operating and equipment cost points of view. Results also show that, the concentration of the Amines has significant effect on the operating cost of this unit: some of them exhibit increasingly, others decreasingly and others even have inflection point (concave up curve); this behavior is due to the fluctuation of the operating cost which concerns the reboiler duty cost and the makeup cost. For each solvent, there is a certain limit to which distillation column can recover the Amine concentration; because reboiler temperature cannot exceed the degradation temperature of the solvent; hence the makeup must carry the shortening of the distillation to achieve the targeted Amine-water solution concentration.

Once the content has been viewed and you have attested to it, you will be able to download and print a certificate for PDH credits. If you have already viewed this content, please click here to login.



Do you already own this?



AIChE Member Credits 0.5
AIChE Members $19.00
AIChE Fuels and Petrochemicals Division Members Free
AIChE Graduate Student Members Free
AIChE Undergraduate Student Members Free
Non-Members $29.00