The Techno-Economic Prospects of Using Piperazine for Carbon Dioxide Removal from Natural Gas
AIChE Member Credits 0.5 AIChE Members $19.00 AIChE Fuels and Petrochemicals Division Members Free AIChE Graduate Student Members Free AIChE Undergraduate Student Members Free Non-Members $29.00
- Type: Conference Presentation
- Conference Type: AIChE Spring Meeting and Global Congress on Process Safety
- Presentation Date: August 18, 2020
- Duration: 20 minutes
- Skill Level: Intermediate
- PDHs: 0.40
The core objective of this work is to evaluate the potential of using Piperazine against the most common Amines which are used nowadays. This article presents a novel investigations of the most significant effective parameters for processing Piperazine, and their influences on the plant efficiency and investment cost. And also has demonstrated that, choosing Piperazine (30%wt) could reduce more than 10% of the operating cost and 4% of the equipment cost in the Acid Gas Removal Unit against the other solvents.
Regarding the methodology, firstly six solvents had been identified to be investigated, then an acceptable range of concentrations (acceptable range of concentrations is that attain solvent stability, and reduce foaming tendency and corrosion rates of the solvent) for each solvent is defined. Next, a design of the facilities at each concentration for the six solvents are simulated using ASPEN HYSYS software. After that, the most economical concentration of each solvent is selected, and then the chosen concentrations are compared in performance and economic point of view.
Results show that Piperazine (30% wt.) is the most effective solvent, which performs Amine loading of 0.8 mol-CO2absorbed/mol-Amine at the specified operating conditions. Moreover it has preceded other alternatives in both operating and equipment cost points of view. Results also show that, the concentration of the Amines has significant effect on the operating cost of this unit: some of them exhibit increasingly, others decreasingly and others even have inflection point (concave up curve); this behavior is due to the fluctuation of the operating cost which concerns the reboiler duty cost and the makeup cost. For each solvent, there is a certain limit to which distillation column can recover the Amine concentration; because reboiler temperature cannot exceed the degradation temperature of the solvent; hence the makeup must carry the shortening of the distillation to achieve the targeted Amine-water solution concentration.
|AIChE Member Credits||0.5|
|AIChE Fuels and Petrochemicals Division Members||Free|
|AIChE Graduate Student Members||Free|
|AIChE Undergraduate Student Members||Free|