Consider Wet Scrubbers for Pollution Control

October
,
2018

Three main types of wet scrubbers are used in the chemical process industries (CPI) to remove contaminants from gas streams. The differences and suggested applications for each are discussed here.

Pollution control equipment is fundamental to chemical process industries (CPI) facilities. Scrubbers are a type of pollution control equipment that are frequently mandated by regulation to promote environmental health and safety and can help recover product. Scrubbers fall into two generalized categories, wet and dry. This article focuses on wet scrubbers, how they operate, and advantages and disadvantages of each type.

Wet scrubbers use a liquid to remove pollutants from a contaminated gas stream via absorption. In most cases, the liquid is water, as it is readily available at most facilities. It is common to include a chemical additive in the water so that the pollutants undergo a reaction and are converted to a less-hazardous compound. The most common chemical is sodium hydroxide, or caustic (NaOH). Because it is a strong base, caustic is an excellent scrubbing agent to remove acid gases, including hydrochloric acid (HCl) and sulfur dioxide (SO2), and can also be used with hydrogen sulfide (H2S), mercaptans, and certain organic macromolecules such as fatty acids. Some facilities use water alone and forgo the use of chemical reagents.

Three main types of wet scrubbers are used in the CPI today: jet venturi fume scrubbers, packed towers, and high-energy jet venturis. Each design is appropriate for certain applications, and knowing which scrubber to specify is an important part of the design process.

Jet venturi

The jet venturi (Figure 1) is the most basic wet scrubber. In this setup, a pressurized liquid is passed through a nozzle and expands as the pressure decreases to atmospheric conditions. This creates an area of low pressure, which draws the gases into the head of the jet venturi. This two-phase mixture is compressed in the converging nozzle. In the throat section, the narrowest point of the venturi, the two fluids are well-mixed and the liquid absorbs the gaseous pollutants. The clean fluid then expands to a gas through the diverging section, slowing as it reaches the outlet. Table 1 summarizes bulk removal efficiencies for different pollutants.

images

Figure 1. A jet venturi fume scrubber can remove moderate to large particles from a stream with a high liquid-to-gas ratio.

Table 1. Removal rates in a jet venturi for pollutants at ambient conditions depend on the contaminant and the type of chemical scrubber used.
Contaminant Removed Scrubbing Liquid Removal Rate
Ammonia (NH3) Water >60%
Acetic Acid (CH3COOH) Caustic >90%
Chlorine (Cl2) Caustic >80%
Hydrochloric Acid (HCl) Caustic >90%
Hydrofluoric Acid (HF) Potassium Hydroxide (KOH) >90%
Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S) Caustic >50%
Sulfuric Acid (H2SO4) Caustic >90%
Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) Caustic >90%

Because most scrubbing applications include high concentrations of noncondensable vapors, the jet venturi scrubber typically discharges the stream into a separator tank. This tank is sized to accommodate the two-phase fluid with sufficient residence time to allow the gaseous phase to separate from the liquid phase. From this point, clean gas is either vented to atmosphere or sent to a second jet venturi or a packed tower for additional removal.

The cocurrent flow and intimate contact between the phases make the jet venturi a good choice where bulk removal is needed. The goal of bulk removal is to reduce the majority of the pollutant exiting the system. For example, if the gas entering the scrubber contains 1,000 ppm of a pollutant and the applicable regulation requires 1 ppm at the scrubber outlet, then the overall removal needed would be:

 
Author Bios: 

Gregory D. MacLeod, P.E.

Gregory D. MacLeod, P.E., is an engineering sales manager for CR Clean Air (Address: 6 Campus Dr., Parsippany, NJ 07054; Phone: 973-947-8787 x121; Email: gmacleod@crcleanair.com), where he specializes in heat and mass transfer and thermodynamics, and is also an adjunct professor at SUNY Orange in Middleton, NY. He has almost 20 years of experience in industry and previously worked as a senior process engineer for Croll Reynolds Co. and as an engineering manager for Exergy, LLC. Macleod earned his BS and MS in chemical engineering from Worcester...Read more

Would you like to access the complete CEP Article?

No problem. You just have to complete the following steps.

You have completed 0 of 2 steps.

  1. Log in

    You must be logged in to view this content. Log in now.

  2. AIChE Membership

    You must be an AIChE member to view this article. Join now.

Copyright Permissions: 

Would you like to reuse content from CEP Magazine? It’s easy to request permission to reuse content. Simply click here to connect instantly to licensing services, where you can choose from a list of options regarding how you would like to reuse the desired content and complete the transaction.