Synthetic Promoters for Precise Control of Gene Expression in Plants

April
,
2017

Synthetic promoters can be designed rationally to provide tremendous advantages over their natural counterparts in terms of promoter strength and specificity.

Considering that scientists have been engineering plants for more than 30 years (the first genetically engineered [GE] plants were produced in 1982), and that plant genetic engineering has enhanced row crop commodities in much of the globe, it is surprising that we are still using some of the earliest-developed tools to control transgene expression in plants.

In the plug-and-play world of genetic engineering, if we want a crop to produce a new protein and trait, such as one that kills certain insect pests, we add a new gene to the crop’s genome. For example, the GE corn and cotton grown all over the world typically contain a single added gene from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt), which encodes a protein that is toxic to a narrow taxonomic range of insect pests.

One goal that genetic engineers are working toward is limiting Bt gene expression to only the crop tissues that are the target of the pests. For example, the cotton bollworm chiefly damages the fruits of the cotton plant (i.e., the bolls). Technically, the Bt gene needs to be expressed only late in the season and only in the bolls. However, the Bt gene used in cotton, and nearly all GE crops, is expressed in nearly all tissues all the time.

For single added traits, this everywhere-all-the-time expression is largely satisfactory. However, as plant genetic engineering goals become more elaborate and targeted, more-precise gene-expression tools will be needed.

Using a transportation design analogy, many of the first automotive components, such as brakes, were co-opted from horse-drawn carriage technology. A lever-activated shoe applied friction to each wheel, thereby slowing the wheel and the vehicle. When vehicles were underpowered (one or two horsepower) and roads were rough, this simple technology was effective.

By the 1930s (when vehicles had tens of horsepower), hydraulic brake systems became widely adopted because they gave more force to the brake shoes, which by then were applying force to wheel drums. By the 1960s and 1970s (when vehicles had a few hundred horsepower), dual master cylinders provided more-precise control over front and rear wheels. Subsequently, disc systems, which are much more effective than drum brakes, were adopted — first for front wheels and later for rear wheels as well.

As engine power and vehicle weight increased, the systems required to slow down and stop the vehicle became more sophisticated and powerful. The current gene expression systems engineered into commercial transgenic crops are akin to the horse-and-buggy brake technologies.

Old and new workhorses for controlling transgene transcription

Gene expression control in plants is very similar to that of other higher organisms, such as humans, animals, fungi, yeast, and insects. Each gene has its own promoter that works in concert with proteins called transcription factors to control the first part of gene expression: transcription (Figure 1).

images

Figure 1. Gene transcription is the production of RNA from the DNA template strand in the presence of the enzymatic RNA polymerase complex in the nucleus. The RNA polymerase adds nucleotides to the growing RNA strand, which is reverse-complementary to the DNA template strand but identical to the coding strand (except that the base thymine in DNA is replaced by uracil in the RNA strand). Source: National Human Genome Research Institute.

In nearly all commercialized transgenic plants, transcription of the transgene is under the control of a strong constitutive promoter such as the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter or the ubiquitin 1 (ubi1) promoter from corn. Both of these promoters were cloned and characterized in the 1980s and 1990s (1, 2), concurrently with the invention of the main plant transformation technologies used today. These two promoters, along with a few others, have been the workhorses of simple gene expression in GE crops.

As the demand for complex metabolic engineering grows, researchers will need more promoters. For example, if scientists want to install multiple novel genes into plants for the biosynthesis of new chemicals, multiple promoters will be required. There are several reasons...

Author Bios: 

C. Neal Stewart, Jr

C. Neal Stewart, Jr., PhD, is the Ivan Racheff Chaired Professor of Plant Molecular Genetics in the Dept. of Plant Sciences at the Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville (Email: nealstewart@utk.edu). He is also the co-director of the Tennessee Plant Research Center. He obtained BS degrees from North Carolina State Univ., and MS and PhD degrees from Virginia Tech, and then held a postdoc position at the Univ. of Georgia. Research in the Stewart lab revolves around synergistic topics such as engineering systems for plant biotechnology and synthetic biology,...Read more

Wusheng Liu

Wusheng Liu, PhD, is a research assistant professor of plant biotechnology and plant synthetic biology in the Dept. of Plant Sciences at the Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville (Email: wliu2@utk.edu). He received his BS and MS from Northeast Forestry Univ. in China, and his PhD from the Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville, and then worked for C. Neal Stewart Jr. as a postdoc. His research focuses on genetic engineering, plant synthetic biology, and genome editing
 ...Read more

Would you like to access the complete CEP Article?

No problem. You just have to complete the following steps.

You have completed 0 of 2 steps.

  1. Log in

    You must be logged in to view this content. Log in now.

  2. AIChE Membership

    You must be an AIChE member to view this article. Join now.

Copyright Permissions: 

Would you like to reuse content from CEP Magazine? It’s easy to request permission to reuse content. Simply click here to connect instantly to licensing services, where you can choose from a list of options regarding how you would like to reuse the desired content and complete the transaction.