CCUS: Utilizing CO2 to Reduce Emissions

June
,
2016

Converting carbon dioxide emissions into valuable products is an exciting concept for the chemical processing industries (CPI).

Carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) technologies may play a critical role in dealing with global carbon dioxide emissions in the 21st century. Whether in leading, supporting, temporary, or other roles, these technologies could be crucial in reducing and removing carbon emissions from the large sources of concentrated CO2: fossil-fuel electric power stations; steel, concrete, cement, and other heavy manufacturing facilities; and natural resource refineries. However, high capital and operating costs, technology risks, and concerns that CCUS could delay a transition away from fossil fuels must be addressed before these technologies can be fully developed, deployed, and accepted.

This article explores the basic approaches to dealing with carbon dioxide emissions, barriers to the adoption of existing CCUS technologies, and CCUS technologies under development today. It describes the NRG COSIA Carbon XPRIZE, a $20-million global competition to catalyze breakthroughs in technologies that convert post-combustion CO2 emissions into valuable products, and the capacity for such incentive prize competitions to create a lasting and meaningful impact on reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.

Global carbon budget

Anthropogenic CO2 emissions are generally discussed within the larger context of energy and climate change. The coupling of science and engineering problems with the social and political discourse around energy, climate, and the environment presents challenges. But it also introduces opportunities to shine a spotlight on technologies at the heart of CO2 production, conversion, and mitigation; on the creative minds developing solutions; and on the impact that breakthroughs in these areas can have inside and outside of the engineering and science communities.

The concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere has increased from around 280 ppm before the start of the industrial revolution in the 18th century to over 400 ppm today, as shown in Figure 1 (1). This rapid increase in CO2 concentration has been accompanied by significant increases in the concentrations of nitrous oxide (N2O) and methane (CH4). The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has reported that, given the stability and lifetime of CO2 in the atmosphere and oceans, emission rates of anthropogenic CO2 will need to be significantly reduced to stabilize overall CO2 concentrations. More recently, some researchers have concluded that stabilizing CO2 concentrations may not be enough, and that “negative carbon” techniques — i.e., approaches that actively remove CO2 from the air and oceans — may be necessary.

images

Figure 1. Atmospheric CO2 concentrations have dramatically increased since 1950. Source: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

The sources of anthropogenic CO2 are well-documented elsewhere, so they are only summarized here. Energy use is responsible for the largest share — roughly 70% of global anthropogenic GHG emissions. Ninety percent of the GHG emissions attributable to energy use are CO2. In 2014, total global CO2 emissions were estimated to be 36 gigatons (Gt) per year (2, 3).

The production of electricity and heat are the leading sources of anthropogenic CO2 (42%), followed by emissions associated with transportation (combustion of liquid fuels), and industry (primarily manufacturing and refining), as shown in Figure 2. Despite rapid developments in renewables (including improvements in technology performance, cost, manufacturing, and deployment), global generation of electricity and heat is still dominated by fossil fuels, particularly coal. Furthermore, the balance between fossil and non-fossil sources of energy worldwide has shifted only slightly over the past generation, from roughly 86% fossil and 14% non-fossil in 1971 to 82% fossil and 18% non-fossil in 2012 (4).

images

Figure 2. The production of electricity and heat is the leading source of CO2 emissions.

The future may not necessarily mirror the past, and history does not preclude an exponential transformation in global energy systems over the next generation. Still, inertial factors in energy systems — such as the decades-long lifespan of coal-fired power plants and other physical assets, and the structure and duration of fuel- and power-purchasing contracts — will continue to present major challenges to achieving such a transformation in the coming 30 or 40 years (4).

Reducing CO2 emissions

Identifying the most efficient path to reducing atmospheric CO2 is the subject of much research and debate. Most solutions being considered fall into one of three categories:

• eliminating CO2 emissions at their source by replacing CO2-intensive processes with alternatives (e.g., replacing fossil-fuel-based electricity generation with a low-carbon-based alternative)

• mitigating CO2 emissions from existing facilities and processes using carbon capture, conversion, utilization, and/or sequestration

• actively removing carbon from the biosphere.

Each general approach has its merits and drawbacks. Specific technologies in each category are discussed later in the article.

Carbon capture and sequestration

Carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) is the process by which CO2 is captured and stored away from the atmosphere and oceans for a very long time. There are four basic elements to a CCS process:

  1. capture the CO2, e.g., by separating the CO2 from the fluegas of a power plant (Figure 3)
  1. compress the gas for transport to a sequestration site
  2. transport the compressed gas
  3. store the compressed gas.
images

Figure 3. Carbon capture involves four basic steps, the first of which is capturing and separating the CO2, for example, from the fluegas of a coal-fired power plant. Source: National Energy Technology Laboratory.

Capture. Capturing CO2 from fluegas is the most energy-intensive and expensive step of a typical CCS process. Separating low-energy and stable CO2 molecules from a stream of mostly nitrogen is difficult. A small portion (< 2%) of large point sources produce concentrated streams containing up to 95% CO2, and for those capture is more efficient and cost-effective. But the overwhelming majority of large point sources emit CO2 at concentrations of 15% or less (5).

Several technologies exist for capturing CO2 from fluegas (6). The most common approaches are (Figure 4):

images

Figure 4. Carbon-capture technologies for power plants fall into three categories: post-combustion, pre-combustion, and oxy-combustion.

absorption. In these systems, fluegas containing CO2 flows through an absorber, where it contacts a solvent that selectively absorbs the CO2. The CO2-rich solvent is regenerated and the CO2 is removed, generally by heating or reducing pressure. The CO2 can then be collected, purified, and compressed and the regenerated solvent recycled. The most common solvent in use today is an aqueous solution of monoethanoamine (MEA) (6). The major costs associated with this method are for the energy required to move fluegas through the contactor and to heat the solvent for regeneration.

membrane separation. Many groups are developing polymer membranes for CO2 separation. These efforts are driven in large part by the high energy consumption and operating costs of traditional MEA systems (7).

pre-combustion capture. Pre-combustion capture of CO2 typically refers to the removal of CO2 from synthesis gas produced at an integrated gasification combined-cycle (IGCC) power plant before the gas is combusted to generate power. In IGCC power plants, coal is first gasified into a synthesis gas (a mixture of mainly hydrogen and carbon monoxide), which undergoes a water-gas shift reaction to convert CO and water to H2 and CO2. The gas is then cleaned and CO2 is separated from the hydrogen. Oxy­combustion is similar to pre-combustion capture except the coal is burned in the presence of oxygen and some fluegas, rather than in air; the nitrogen-free, oxygen-rich environment dramatically increases the concentration of CO2 in the exiting fluegas.

physical capture by advanced materials. New materials that rely on physical, electrochemical, ionization, and other approaches to separate CO2 from dilute gas streams are under development. These materials rely on physical pores for adsorption, functionalized sites, cages and traps, or other mechanisms (8).

Air capture. Air capture, also referred to as direct air capture or atmospheric capture, is a process of directly separating CO2 from the atmosphere, typically at or near the earth’s surface (troposphere). Air capture may use methods similar to solvent absorption, and it faces similar challenges with respect to energy costs for moving air and regenerating solvents. The high costs are exacerbated in air capture systems because the...

Author Bios: 

Marcius Extavour

Marcius Extavour is Director of Technical Operations, NRG COSIA Carbon XPRIZE, Energy and Environment Group, XPRIZE, (Email: marcius.extavour@xprize.org), where he leads the operational and technical aspects of the $20-million NRG COSIA Carbon XPRIZE. Over the past 15 years, he has applied his background in experimental physics and engineering to complex problems in industry, government, and academia. This work took him to the U.S. Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, where he held the Optical Society (OSA)/International Society...Read more

Paul Bunje

Paul Bunje is a senior scientist in the Energy and Environment Group, XPRIZE (Email: paul.bunje@xprize.org ), where he uses his ability to bridge the gap between science and society to incentivize solutions to diverse challenges facing the world, including climate change, energy, and the oceans. This work includes leading the $2-million Wendy Schmidt Ocean Health XPRIZE and the $20-million NRG COSIA Carbon XPRIZE. He has served as the founding Executive Director of the Univ. of California, Los Angeles, Center for Climate Change Solutions, and as...Read more

Would you like to access the complete CEP Article?

No problem. You just have to complete the following steps.

You have completed 0 of 2 steps.

  1. Log in

    You must be logged in to view this content. Log in now.

  2. AIChE Membership

    You must be an AIChE member to view this article. Join now.

Copyright Permissions: 

Would you like to reuse content from CEP Magazine? It’s easy to request permission to reuse content. Simply click here to connect instantly to licensing services, where you can choose from a list of options regarding how you would like to reuse the desired content and complete the transaction.