When MOC Meets LOPA: A Quantitative Assessment of the Impact of Errors in MOCs

  • Type:
    Conference Presentation
  • Conference Type:
    Global Congress on Process Safety
  • Presentation Date:
    April 2, 2012
  • Skill Level:
  • PDHs:

Share This Post:

You will be able to download and print a certificate for PDH credits once the content has been viewed. If you have already viewed this content, please click here to login.

Layers of Protection Analysis, "LOPA", has become a popular tool for conducting semi-quantitative risk assessments, in the chemical process industries. A key concept is that of "Independent Protection Layers", whereby subsequent layers are intended to mitigate adverse events that were not mitigated by prior layers.

Interestingly, as a Management of Change instance goes through its lifecycle--Initiation > Scoping > Change Design > Impact Analysis > Approvals > Implementation > PSSR > Close-out--each subsequent state is somewhat analogous to an independent protection layer. For example the Impact Analysis activities are intended to catch deficiencies made during Change Design; the PSSR is intended to catch deficiencies made during Implementation, and so on.

While the LOPA to MOC analogy is not perfect, it is useful as a guide to permit the calculation of overall error rates caused by and occurring during MOCs. This paper assesses the overall MOC error rates, and discusses their impacts on MOC costs, duration and risk, and recommends where effort should be directed to minimize negative impacts.




Do you already own this?

Log In for instructions on accessing this content.


AIChE Member Credits 0.5
AIChE Members $15.00
AIChE Undergraduate Student Members Free
AIChE Graduate Student Members Free
Non-Members $25.00