(100c) Mitigation Technologies for Hydrogen Storage Systems Based On Reactive Solids | AIChE

(100c) Mitigation Technologies for Hydrogen Storage Systems Based On Reactive Solids

Authors 

Dedrick, D. E. - Presenter, Sandia National Labs
Kanouff, M. P. - Presenter, Sandia National Labs
Cordaro, J. G. - Presenter, Sandia National Laboratories
Khalil, Y. (. F. - Presenter, United Technologies Research Center (UTRC)


This paper describes mitigation technologies that are intended to enable the deployment of advanced hydrogen storage technologies for early market and automotive fuel cell applications.

Solid State hydrogen storage materials provide an opportunity for a dramatic increase in gravimetric and volumetric energy storage density. Systems and technologies based on the advanced materials have been developed and demonstrated within the laboratory [1,2], and in some cases, integrated with fuel cell systems. The R&D community will continue to develop these technologies for an ever increasing market of fuel cell technologies, including, forklift, light-cart, APU, and automotive systems.

Solid state hydrogen storage materials are designed and developed to readily release, and in some cases, react with diatomic hydrogen. This favorable behavior is often accomplished with morphology design (high surface area), catalytic additives (titanium for example), and high purity metals (such as aluminum, Lanthanum, or alkali metals). These favorable hydrogen reaction characteristics often have a related, yet less-desirable effect: sensitivity and reactivity during exposure to ambient contamination and out-of-design environmental conditions. Accident scenarios resulting in this less-favorable reaction behavior must also be managed by the system developer to enable technology deployment and market acceptance.

Two important accident scenarios are identified through hazards and risk analysis methods. The first involves a breach in plumbing or tank resulting from a collision. The possible consequence of this scenario is analyzed though experimentally based chemical kinetic and transport modeling of metal hydride beds. An advancing reaction front between the metal hydride and ambient air is observed to proceed throughout the bed. This exothermic reaction front can result in loss of structural integrity of the containing vessel and lead to un-favorable overheating events. The second important accident scenario considered is a pool fire or impinging fire resulting from a collision between a hydrocarbon or hydrogen fueled vehicle. The possible consequence of this scenario is analyzed with experimentally-based numerical simulation of a metal hydride system. During a fire scenario, the hydrogen storage material will rapidly decompose and release hydrogen at high pressure. Accident scenarios initiated by a vehicular collision leading a pipe break or catastrophic failure of the hydride vessel and by external pool fire with flame engulfing the storage vessel are developed using probabilistic modeling. The chronology of events occurring subsequent to each accident initiator is detailed in the probabilistic models.

Technology developed to manage these scenarios includes: (1) the use of polymer supports to reduce the extent and rate of reaction with air and water, (2) thermal radiation shielding. The polymer supported materials are demonstrated to provide mitigation of unwanted reaction while not impacting the hydrogen storage performance of the material. To mitigate the consequence of fire engulfment or impingement, thermal radiation shielding is considered to slow the rate of decomposition and delay the potential for loss-of-containment. In this paper we explore the use of these important mitigation technologies for a variety of accident scenarios.

[1]D. Dedrick, ?Heat and mass transport in metal hydride based hydrogen storage systems?, HT2009-88231 Proceedings of HT2009 ASME Summer Heat Transfer Conference July 19-23, 2009, San Francisco, CA [2]D. Mosher, ?High Density Hydrogen Storage System Demonstration Using NaAlH4 Complex Compound Hydrides, 2007 DOE H2 Annual Peer Review, Arlington, VA May 16, 2007

Topics