(91c) Pressure: The Neglected Variable in High Pressure Processing
AIChE Annual Meeting
2018
2018 AIChE Annual Meeting
Computational Molecular Science and Engineering Forum
In Honor of Pablo Debenedetti I (Invited Talks)
Monday, October 29, 2018 - 8:25am to 8:45am
There is an abundance of anecdotal evidence that nano-phases adsorbed on solid substrates or within nano-porous materials can exhibit high pressures as a result of the confinement1,2. For example, phase changes and chemical reactions that only occur at high pressures in the bulk phase occur in the adsorbed film or confined phase at bulk phase pressures that are orders of magnitude lower. The pressure in the film is different in different directions; for simple surface geometries there is a pressure normal to the surface of the substrate, and one parallel to the walls components (tangential pressure).
For simple fluids in pores that are up to a few nanometers in width, molecular simulations show that both the normal and tangential pressures can be locally very high (thousands or tens of thousands of bars, for example) in the film, even though the bulk phase in equilibrium with the pore is at a pressure of one bar or less. The cause of these high in-film pressures will be discussed, and where possible comparison with experimental results will be made3.
When the molecules in the confined nano-phase react with each other chemically, or with the pore walls, it may be possible to achieve even higher tangential pressures, in the megabar range. Evidence for this is provided by recent experiments on sulfur (an insulator at ambient conditions) in narrow single-walled carbon nanotubes, carried out by Kaneko and coworkers4. They find that the sulfur atoms within the pore covalently bond to form a one-dimensional phase that is metallic. In the bulk phase sulfur forms a metallic phase only at pressures above 95 GPa. In our recent molecular dynamics simulations of this system5 we find that the sulfur atoms are covalently bonded in the pore and that they experience tangential pressures in excess of 100 GPa as a result of the strong confinement. In a second example, the nitric oxide dimer reaction, 2NO = (NO)2, the dimer molecules interact strongly (âchemicallyâ) with the pore wall, leading to a 100% yield of the dimer in the pores, in contrast to a yield of less than 1% in a gas phase at the same thermodynamic conditions. Again the tangential pressures in the reacting phase near the pore walls is found to be in the megabar range.6
1 Yun Long, Jeremy C. Palmer, Benoit Coasne, MaÅgorzata Åliwinska-Bartkowiak and Keith E. Gubbins, âPressure enhancement in carbon nanopores: A major confinement effectâ, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 13, 17163-17170 (2011).
2 Yun Long, Jeremy C. Palmer, Benoit Coasne, MaÅgorzata Åliwinska-Bartkowiak, George Jackson, Erich A. Müller and Keith E. Gubbins, âOn the Molecular Origin of High Pressure Effects in Nanoconfinement: Effects of Surface Chemistry and Roughnessâ, Journal of Chemical Physics, 139, 144701 (2013)
3 M. Åliwinska-Bartkowiak, H. Drozdowski, M. Kempinski, M. Jazdzewska, Y. Long, J.C. Palmer and K.E. Gubbins, âStructural Analysis of the Behavior of Water Adsorbed in Activated Carbon Fibersâ, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 14, 7145-7153 (2012).
4 Y. Fujimori, A. Morelos-Gómez, Z. Zhu, et al., âConducting Linear Chains of Sulphur Inside Carbon Nanotubesâ, Nature Comm., 4, 3162 (2013).
5 Cody K. Addington, J. Matthew Mansell and Keith E. Gubbins, âComputer Simulation of Conductive Linear Sulfur Chains Confined in Carbon Nanotubesâ, Molecular Simulation, 43, 519-525 (2016).
6 Deepti Srivastava, Erik E. Santiso and Keith E. Gubbins, âDimerization of Nitric Oxide: Effect of Confinement in Carbon Nanoporesâ, to be published (2017).