(703b) Tribo-Charging of Binary Mixtures Composed of Coarse and Fine Particles in Gas-Solid Pipe Flow

Authors: 
Fotovat, F., Sharif University of Technology
Wang, H., China University of Mining and Technology
Bi, X., University of British Columbia
Grace, J. R., University of British Columbia

Tribo-charging
of Binary Mixtures Composed of Coarse and Fine Particles in Gas-Solid Pipe Flow

Farzam Fotovat1,2*, Haifeng Wang1,3,
Xiaotao T. Bi1 and John R. Grace1

1Fluidization
Research Centre, Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering,

University of British
Columbia, Vancouver, Canada V6T 1Z3

2Department
of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, Sharif University of Technology,

Azadi Avenue, P.O.
Box 11365-9465, Tehran, Iran

3Department
of Chemical Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology,

Xuzhou, China, 221166

                             
1.     
Introduction

Despite
the studies carried out on tribo-charging of particle mixtures composed of fine
and coarse particles, it is not clear yet how fines alter the tribo-charging
behavior of coarse particles in gas-solid flows. Moreover, the effect of the
physical, chemical and electrical properties of particles on the
electrification of powdery mixtures has not been well understood, requiring further
investigation. In this study, tribo-charging of mixtures of coarse glass beads
and conductive or non-conductive fines of different compositions is
investigated in a pneumatic conveying system. Understanding the relationship
between charge density and composition of particle mixtures, as well as determining
the impact of fine particle properties on electrification of binary mixtures of
fine and coarse materials are the key objectives of this investigation.     

 
2.     
Modeling electrification of binary
mixtures in dilute gas-solids pipe flow

According
to the model developed by Matsusaka & Masuda 1 based
on a condenser model 2,3,the
mass charge density of an initially neutral single spherical particle charged
in a dilute gas-solids pipe flow is

(1)

where S and z0
are the contact area and the critical gap between the contact bodies (particle
and pipe wall in our case). ρp and dpare
the particle density and diameter, respectively. n denotes the number of
particle-wall collisions, and ε0 is vacuum permittivity (8.854×10−12
F/m). kc is the charging efficiency and Vc
is the potential difference based on the surface work functions of contacting
bodies:

(2)

where ϕp
and ϕw are the work functions of the particle and pipe
wall, respectively, and e is the elementary charge. Note that the
potential differences arising from space and image charges are assumed to be negligible
in the systems studied here. It is also assumed
that Vc of a binary mixture is obtained from the
superposition of the potential differences between fine/coarse particles and
the pipe wall, i.e. Vcf and Vcc,
respectively:

(3)

To
adapt Eq. (1) to a binary mixture of dissimilar particles, we assume that n
is proportional to the total number of particles in the mixture:

(4)

where
k is the proportionality factor. Nf, and Nc
are the number of fine and coarse particles in the unit mass of the mixture,
respectively, calculated as follows:

(5)

(6)

where
x is the weight fraction of fine particles in the mixture. The c
and f subscripts denote the coarse and fine particles, respectively. From
Eqs. (1) and (3-6), the net charge of all fine and coarse particles in a unit
mass of a binary mixture is given by:

(7)

The
coefficient of Eq. (7) can be obtained by fitting the equation with the measured
mass charge densities of the mixtures.

 
3.     
Experimental
3.1.  
Materials

Glass beads were chosen in this study as the coarse
material for all mixtures. Conductive silver-coated fine glass beads (SFGB) and
uncoated dielectric fine glass beads (FGB) were used as fine materials added to
coarse glass beads (CGB). These fine materials were similar in terms of mean
size, size distribution, and density. Table 1 provides the key properties of CGB
and fines used in this study.

Table 1. Properties of materials used in this study

Particles

Material density, ρp (kg/m3)

Size range (μm)

Mean diameter (μm)

Particle sphericity φp (-)

Specific surface area (m2/kg)

Work function (ev)

Electrical conductivity, at 20-25oC (S/m)

Coarse glass beads (CGB)

2458

240-830

528

~0.9

4.6

5.32 (Glass) 4

1.5×10-11* NC

Silver-coated fine glass beads (SFGB)

2690

15-90

38

~ 1.0

65.6

4.26-4.74 (silver) (4.25**) 5

6.3×107 (silver) C

Fine glass beads (FGB)  

2700*

25-50

38

~1.0

72

(4.7) **

1.5×10-11* NC

C Conductive, NC Non-conductive

*Provided by supplier

** Fitted experimental data

 
3.2.  
Charge measurements

The electrostatic test system used in the present work
consisted of a cylindrical feeder, a grounded stainless steel spiral tube (3.0
m in length, 0.64 cm in diameter, 2 coils (ds=0.15 m) per meter)
for tribo-charging, a Faraday cup for charge measurement, and control valves. Dry
building air was used as the particle-carrying gas. During the tests,
temperature and relative humidity were varied in the ranges of 16.9 to 25.7oC
and 0.2% to 7.2%, respectively. Based on
the preliminary experiments carried out to obtain reproducible experimental
conditions, 1.0 g particle was conveyed in the pipe by air flowing with the
velocity of 16.5 m/s in all tests. The air inlet pressure was about 600 kPa.

In order to prepare 1.0 g mixtures consisting of 0.2,
1.0, 2.0, 5.0, 10.0, 20.0, 30.0, 70.0, and 90.0 wt.% fines, predetermined
amounts of fines and CGB were mixed together. In addition, 1.0 g of CGB and 1.0
g fines were tested in separate experiments. The charge measurements of each mixture and pure materials were repeated
at least three times.

 
4.     
Preliminary Results

Charge
densities of CGB-SFGB mixtures of various compositions are shown in Fig.
1. Unlike the negative polarity of pure
CGB, pure silver-coated fine glass beads were charged positively, consistent
with the negative Vcf value
obtained from Eq. (2), knowing the work functions of the stainless steel pipe
wall and SFGB provided in Table 1. Compared to the pure coarse particles, the
magnitude of charge densities of mixtures to which less than 10 wt. % of fines had
been added increased with increasing fines content, and the charge polarities remained
negative. With increasing weight
proportion of SFGB in the mixture beyond 10%, the charge polarity changed from
negative to positive and the charge density then slightly increased.

Fig.1. Mass charge density of CGB- SFGB mixtures vs. weight fraction, x, of fine particles. Error bars show ± one standard deviation from the average experimental measurements.

Fig.
2 depicts the effect of added fine glass beads (FGB) on tribo-charging of CGB. As
per SFGB alone, uncoated fine glass beads by themselves were charged positively,
despite the negative polarity of pure CGB. This shows that the fine and coarse
glass beads used in our study likely differed in chemical composition or
surface properties, leading to dissimilar contact potential differences with
the pipe wall.

Adding
FGB to coarse glass beads resulted in an increase in the absolute value of mass
charge density, relative to pure CGB. The charge polarity remained negative when
the weight percentage of fines was less than 10 wt.%. Further addition of fines
reversed the mixture polarity, and the charge density then leveled off. Despite
the lower magnitude of charge densities for CGB-FGB mixtures than for
corresponding CGB-SFGB mixtures, charge densities of both systems followed similar
trends when changing the weight fraction of fines from 0 to 1.

Fig. 6. Mass charge density of CGB-FGB mixtures vs. weight fraction, x, of fine particles. Error bars show ± one standard deviation from the average experimental measurements.

 

As seen in Figs. 1 and 2, |qm|
experienced a local maximum at x ≈ 0.1, beyond which contacts between fine
particles and the pipe wall became the dominant charging mechanism, as inferred
from the change in the charge polarity. Thus, observation
of charge polarity reversal in gas-solid pipe flows involving mixtures of fine
and coarse particles can signify a change in the type of particles dominantly
in contact with the pipe wall. Figs. 1 and 2 depict that the measured
charge densities of mixtures with x > 0.1 were widely scattered, likely due
to the opposite charge polarities of fine and coarse particles and the major influence
of turbulence on the dynamics of fine particles, as discussed below.

Figs. 1 and 2 also suggest that
Eq. (7) could successfully predict the trend in the mass charge densities of
all tested mixtures as a function of the fines content. The discrepancy observed between the experimental results and the
proposed model in Figs. 1 and 2,
especially in the range with low fraction of fine particles, is likely
attributed to negligence of particle-particle interactions, which should be
further investigated in the future.

 
References

1.       Matsusaka S, Masuda H. Simultaneous measurement of mass flow
rate and charge-to-mass ratio of particles in gas-solids pipe flow. Chem Eng
Sci
. 2006;61(7):2254-2261.

2.       Matsusaka S, Maruyama H, Matsuyama T, Ghadiri M. Triboelectric
charging of powders: A review. Chem Eng Sci. 2010;65(22):5781-5807.

3.       Matsusaka S, Ghadiri M, Masuda H. Electrification of an elastic
sphere by repeated impacts on a metal plate. J Phys D Appl Phys.
2000;33(18):2311-2319.

4.       Trigwell S, Grable N, Yurteri CU, Sharma R, Mazumder MK. Effects
of surface properties on the tribocharging characteristics of polymer powder as
applied to industrial processes. IEEE Trans Ind Appl. 2003;39(1):79-86.

5.       Dweydari AW, Mee CHB. Work function measurements on (100) and
(110) surfaces of silver. Phys status solidi. 1975;27(1):223-230.