(440h) Plantwide Process Design with Automatic Column Optimization, Sequencing and Stacking Using a Rigorous Process Simulator | AIChE

(440h) Plantwide Process Design with Automatic Column Optimization, Sequencing and Stacking Using a Rigorous Process Simulator

Authors 

Ward, J. D. - Presenter, National Taiwan University
Ni, Y. W., National Taiwan University
Column sequencing refers to the problem of determining the optimal column sequence of distillation columns for multicomponent separation. For example, for the separation of three components, ABC, there are two possible sequences: the direct split (A/BC followed by B/C) and the indirect split (AB/C followed by B/C). The number of possible sequences grows rapidly as the number of components to be separated grows. The column sequencing problem has been widely studied in the literature [1–11], although most researchers use shortcut equations (e.g. the Fenske-Underwood-Gilliland column design method) for the column design in order to reduce the computational load.

Column stacking refers to the process of adjusting the operating pressure of one or more columns so that the reboiler of one or more columns can be powered by condenser of another column. Depending on the temperature difference between the top and bottom of the columns and the temperatures of the utilities, three or more columns can be stacked on top of each other. This type of heat integration can significantly reduce energy consumption. Column stacking has also been widely studied in the literature [12–16], although again mostly using shortcut models.

Finally, it is well known that for many problems of practical interest, there is a tradeoff between the design of the reactor or reactor network and the cost of separation [17]. Specifically, for many problems of practical interest, selectivity decreases as per-pass conversion increases, so there is a tradeoff between selectivity losses at high conversion and separation cost (for recycle of unconsumed reactant) at low per-pass conversion. Thus in order to determine the optimal plant-wide process design, it is necessary to consider the design of the reactor or reactor network and the separation system simultaneously. For greater accuracy, it would be desirable to use a rigorous process simulator rather than shortcut column design equations.

In the present contribution, these problems are approached using a rigorous process simulator (Aspen Plus) coupled with a high-level procedural programming language (Matlab). The two programs are connected using a client-server architecture, in which Matlab is the client and Aspen Plus is the server. A process flowsheet consisting of a single distillation column is constructed in Aspen Plus, and this flowsheet is used to model each column in every sequence by changing the feed conditions. The reflux rate and boilup rate are manipulated (varied) in order to achieve desired specifications on the top and bottom product distributions. The optimal number of trays and feed tray location are determined by optimization using simulated annealing programmed in Matlab.

The code determines the optimal design of each column in every sequence and adds up the cost to determine the optimal column sequence. Once the optimal sequence is identified, the code automatically implements column stacking by adjusting the operating pressures of the columns within the limits of feasibility (given temperatures for the utilities and a minimum temperature driving force). Finally, this entire process (automatic column design, sequencing and stacking) is coupled with a model of a chemical reactor (in a separate Aspen flowsheet) to determine the optimal plantwide process design by adjusting reactor network design parameters (temperature and residence time) to find the optimal tradeoff between selectivity losses and separation costs using the optimized separation system design in each case.

References

[1] Nishida N.; G. Stephanopoulous; A. W. Westerberg. A review of process synthesis. AIChE Journal 1981, 27, 321-351.

[2] Tedder D. W; Rudd D. F. Parametric Studies in Industrial Distillation Part I. Design Comparisons. AIChE Journal 1978, 24, 303-315.

[3] Stephanopoulos G; Westerberg A. W. Studies in Process Synthesis–II. Evolutionary Synthesis of Optimal Process Flowsheets. Chemical Engineering Science 1976, 31, 195-204.

[4] Malone M. F.; K. Glinos; F. E. Marquez; J. M. Douglas. Simple analytical criterion for the sequencing of distillation columns. AIChE Journal 1985, 31, 686-689.

[5] P. B. Gadkari; R. Govind. Analytical Screening Criterion for Sequencing of Distillation Columns. Computer & Chemical Engineering 1988, 12, 1199-1213.

[6] M. Bezzina; L. Pibouleau; S. Domenech. A Statistical Approach to the Synthesis of Separation Sequences. Computer & Chemical Engineering 1989, 13, 651-660.

[7] Floquet, P.; L. Pibouleau.; S. Domenech. Separation Sequence Synthesis: How to Use Simulated Annealing Procedure? Computer. Chem. Eng 1994, 18, 1141-1148.

[8] An, W-Z.; Yuan X-G. A Simulated Annealing-Based Approach to the Optimal Synthesis of Heat-Integrated Distillation Sequences. Computers and Chemical Engineering 2009, 33, 199-212.

[9] F. Wang; Y. Luo; X. Yuan; A Formulation Methodology for Multicomponent Distillation Sequences Based on Stochastic Optimization. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering 2016, 24, 1229-1235.

[10] Boozarjomehry R. B.; A. Pourahmadi Laleh; W. Y. Svrcek. Automatic Design of Conventional Distillation Column Sequence by Genetic Algorithm. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 2009, 87, 477-492.

[11] Boozarjomehry R. B.; A. Pourahmadi Laleh; W. Y. Svrcek. Evolutionary Design of Optimum Distillation Column Sequence. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 2012, 90, 956-972.

[12] Andrecovich, M. J.; A. W. Westerberg. A Simple Synthesis Method Based on Utility Bounding for Heat-Integrated Distillation Sequences. AIChE Journal. 1985(b); 31: 363-375.

[13] Andrecovich, M. J.; A. W. Westerberg. An MILP Formulation for Heat-Integrated Distillation Sequence Synthesis. AIChE Journal 1985(a), 31, 1461-1474.

[14] Andrecovich, M. J.; A. W. Westerberg. Utility Bounds for Nonconstant QΔT for Heat-Integrated Distillation Sequence Synthesis. AIChE Journal 1985(c), 31, 1475-1479.

[15] C. A. Floudas; G. E. Paules IV. A Mixed-Integer Nonlinear Programming Formulation for the Synthesis of Heat-Integrated Distillation Sequences. Computers & Chemical Engineering 1988, 12, 531-546.

[16] Jaroslav, J.; Radim Ptacnlk. Synthesis of heat integrated rectification systems. Comput. Chem. Engng 1988, 12, 427-432.

[17] Douglas, J. M. Conceptual design of chemical processes. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1988.