(621ei) Spatially Resolved in Situ Study of Lean NOx Reduction in the NSR+SCR Sequential Configuration

Authors: 
Li, M., University of Houston
Easterling, V., University of Houston
Harold, M. P., University of Houston

Spatio-temporal features of lean NOx
reduction in the NSR+SCR sequential configuration

 

Mengmeng Li, Vencon G. Easterling, Michael P. Harold*

Dept. of Chemical
& Biomolecular Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, Texas

*https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/images/cleardot.gifcorresponding author e-mail: mpharold@central.uh.edu

NOx storage and reduction (NSR) and
selective catalytic reduction (SCR) are the two leading technologies utilized
to achieve the stringent NOx emission limits for lean-burn gasoline and diesel
engines. SCR catalysts utilize NH3 as the reductant which requires a
urea dosing system. An alternative approach that is attractive for light-duty
vehicles involves locating the lean NOx trap (LNT) catalyst upstream of a SCR
which enables the generation of NH3 during the rich phase of
periodic (lean-rich switching) operation [1]. Although previous studies have
demonstrated the synergy of combining a LNT with a SCR, most of these studies
have utilized H2 and CO as the rich feed components while real
diesel exhaust reductants are primarily hydrocarbons (HCs). Previous studies
have shown that unconverted HCs from the LNT can also reduce NOx
over SCR catalysts [2]. In order to reduce the volume of the more expensive
LNT, ideally half the NOx should be converted to NH3 to give the 1:1
NH3:NOx ratio (ANR) that is most suitable for the downstream SCR.
Thus it is of interest to determine the optimal LNT+SCR configuration and
operating conditions using realistic hydrocarbon reductants.

In this study, we conduct bench flow reactor
experiments involving monolith LNT+SCR catalysts to determine the conditions
which approach ANR ~1 for CO and propylene as reductants. We also utilize
spatially-resolved capillary inlet mass spectrometry (SpaciMS) to construct the
spatial and temporal dependencies of reacting species concentrations and
temperature spanning the two reactors. The experiments provide insight into the
synergy between the two catalysts in terms of the NOx storage and reduction
including: NH3 generation, storage and consumption; supplemental
reduction provided by the propylene; and nonisothermal effects from HC
oxidation.

The experiments indicate that NOx
reduction with propylene becomes comparable with CO when the feed temperature
is above 300 °C;
both reductants in fact can achieve >90% NOx cycle-average conversion across
the LNT+SCR. Typical data is shown in Fig. 1 for an experiment comprising a 60
s lean, 5 s rich cycle using propylene as the reductant. An NH3
yield of ~40% is achieved in the LNT, which is then consumed through reaction
with NOx in the SCR. Over a range of temperatures, with increasing space
velocity (GHSV), the NOx conversion expectedly decreases. The blue bar in Fig. 1
indicates the NH3 yield. For example, at 400 °C and GHSV between135,000 h-1 and 180,000 h-1the NOx
conversion is ~50%, while the NH3 yield is ~43% resulting in an ANR
value approaching the desired value of 1. Although the NOx conversion in the
LNT decreases at higher space velocities, the SCR is able to compensate due to
the favorable NH3 to NOx feed ratio. The optimal GHSV for this set
of experimental conditions was determined to be between 135,000 h-1 and
180,000 h-1for the sequential LNT+SCR.

The spatial dependence of the NOx
concentration was measured by SpaciMS to elucidate its reduction features. Fig.
2 shows a 3-D plot of NOx concentration as a function of time and position in
the LNT+SCR catalyst system during the 65s combined cycle at 350 °C. The rich phase started at 60s and
lasted 5s. Both LNT and SCR monoliths are 2 cm long; hence, the 0 cm position
corresponds to the front face of the LNT catalyst (the front face of the SCR is
at 2cm). All subsequent positions are in reference to the distance from the
front face of the LNT catalyst. At the front face of the LNT, a small NOx spike
or "puff" is apparent during the rich phase which is likely the result of
stored NOx that is released due to the exotherm from the oxidation of the C3H6,
which results in a ~90 °C temperature increase at the front face of LNT catalyst. Fig.
3 shows the reaction temperature along LNT+SCR catalyst system length as a
function of time. It indicates that most of the C3H6 is consumed
at the front portion of LNT catalyst which observed to be the highest
temperature difference. The cycle-averaged temperature increased 20 °C along SCR catalyst. The decrease in
this NOx peak along the length of the SCR section indicates that NH3
breakthrough from the upstream LNT contributes to NOx reduction over SCR
catalyst, especially at the front portion of SCR where most of NOx breakthrough
from LNT during the lean phase was eliminated. It is interesting to note that during
NOx reduction, formaldehyde was observed in the reactor system effluent by FTIR,
which also reported by Kim et al. [2]. Fig. 4 compares the m/z 30 intensity profile
at the reaction condition with (Fig. 4a) or without NO (Fig. 4b). Two different
peaks were observed in both lean and early rich phase in Fig. 4(b) (without NO
in the reaction conditions). The HCHO formation pathway over SCR catalyst was
still ongoing.

Fig. 1.
Cycle-averaged NOx conversion (red+ blue) and NH3 yield (blue) over
LNT catalyst LNT+SCR catalysts (Lean: 200 ppm NO, 6% O2, bal. Ar.
Rich: 500 ppm NO, 1% O2, 6055 ppmC3H6, bal. Ar).

 

Fig. 2. Spatially-resolved
profiles of NOx during cycling conditions at 350
°C.
(Lean: 200 ppm NO, 6% O2, 9% CO2 and 7% H2O, bal.
Ar, Rich: 6055 ppm C3H6, 1% O2, 9% CO2
and 7% H2O, GHSV: 90
,000 h-1).

 

Fig. 3. Spatially-resolved profiles of reaction temperature as a function of time during
the cyclic reduction of NOx by C3H6 at 350
°C (Lean: 200 ppm NO, 6% O2,
9% CO2 and 7% H2O, bal. Ar, Rich: 6055 ppm C3H6,
1% O2, 9% CO2 and 7% H2O, bal. Ar, GHSV: 90,000
h-1).

Fig. 4. Temporal profiles of m/z 30 a) with NO in lean
phase
(Lean: 200 ppm
NO, 6% O2, 9% CO2 and 7% H2O, Rich: 9300 ppm C3H6,
1% O2, 9% CO2 and 7% H2O, bal. Ar, GHSV: 135,000
h-1) and b) without NO in lean phase (Lean: 6% O2, 9% CO2
and 7% H2O, Rich: 9300 ppm C3H6, 1% O2,
9% CO2 and  7% H2O, bal. Ar, GHSV: 135,000 h-1)
over LNT+SCR catalyst at 350 °C.

 

References

1.     
U.S. Patent
6176079

2.     
M.Y. Kim, J. S.
Choi, and M. Crocker, Catal. Today, 231 (2014) 90-98.

3.     
R. D. Clayton,
M. P. Harold, V. Balakotaiah and C. Z. Wan, Appl. Catal. B, 90 (2009)
662-676.