(308e) A Centralized/Decentralized Control Approach for the Multicolumn Countercurrent Solvent Gradient Purification (MCSGP) Process

Authors: 
Papathanasiou, M. M., Imperial College London
Sun, M., Imperial College London
Steinebach, F., ETH Zurich
Mueller-Spaeth, T., ChromaCon AG
Morbidelli, M., ETH Zurich
Mantalaris, A., Imperial College London
Pistikopoulos, E. N., Texas A&M Energy Institute, Texas A&M University

A
centralized/decentralized control approach for the Multicolumn Countercurrent
Solvent Gradient Purification (MCSGP) process

Maria M.
Papathanasioua,d, Muxin Suna, Fabian Steinebachb,
Thomas Müller-Späthc, Massimo Morbidellib, Athanasios
Mantalarisa, Efstratios N. Pistikopoulosd*

aDept. of Chemical Engineering, Centre for Process
Systems Engineering (CPSE), Imperial College London SW7 2AZ, Lodnon, U.K

b Institute for Chemical and Bioengineering, ETH
Zurich,

Wolfgang-Pauli-Str. 10/HCI F 129,
CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland

c ChromaCon
AG, Technoparkstr. 1, CH-8005 Zurich, Switzerland

dArtie McFerrin Department of
Chemical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station TX 77843

*stratos@tamu.edu

 

Keywords: periodic processes,
multi-parametric, control, stability

Industrial applications, such as
separation processes and pressure swing adsorption systems (PSA) are
characterized by cyclic operation profiles and they often involve tight
constraints on product purity. In order to maintain the process under optimal operation,
advanced computational tools need to be developed. The latter include
optimization strategies and optimal control policies that are designed to meet
the process constraints. During the past few years, several research groups
have been focusing on the development of such tools, aiming to tackle issues
related to system periodicity and nonlinearity [1-6].

In this work we present a
centralized/decentralized control approach based on the principles of the
Multicolumn Countercurrent Solvent Gradient Purification (MCSGP) process. MCSGP
is an industrial, semi-continuous chromatographic separation process used for
the purification of various biomolecules [7]. The system is described by a
highly nonlinear Partial Differential and Algebraic Equation (PDAE) model that
operates under a cyclic profile. Following our previously presented work [8, 9] we demonstrate a seamless
procedure for the development of advanced decentralized multi-parametric
control strategies for the system at hand.

The examined system shifts
periodically between two distinct configurations (Figure 1). Figure 1a
illustrates the continuous operation mode, where the two columns operate
connected to each other. This is usually followed by batch operation as shown
in Figure 1b. For further details regarding the complete system operation the
reader is referred to Krättli,
et al. [10
].
In this study we develop independent control strategies for each column that
are then linked during the interconnected operation, tracking the integral of
the outlet concentrations. In particular, the outlet of column A is treated as
a disturbance by the controller operating on column B during continuous
operation (Figure 1a).

Figure
1
Chromatographic system based on the principles of MCSGP for (a) continuous and
(b) batch operation mode, considering the modifier concentration as input, the
integral of the three outlet concentrations as outputs and the feed composition
as measured disturbance.

The periodic operation profile and
the disturbances occurring from the feed stream render the preservation of the optimal
operating conditions a challenging task. Therefore, to ensure optimal operation
throughout the process cycle, the controller stability needs to be guaranteed. Following
the framework presented by Pistikopoulos, et al. [8]
the controller development is based on the derivation of a linear state space
model that describes the system dynamics. The optimal periodic steady state and
input strategy for the tracked process intervals are calculated off-line,
minimizing the cost function of the optimization problem [11]. The online control scheme can
then be applied by driving the system to the pre-computed optimal periodic
steady state by using multi-parametric Model Predictive Control (mp-MPC)
(Pistikopoulos, 2009).
To prove the stability of the
cyclic process we introduce a transformed system as suggested by to Huang,
et al. [12
].

The designed controllers are then
tested in-silico, in a ?closed-loop' fashion, using the original process model [8].
Due to the system dynamics a repetitive output time delay is observed that
corresponds to the time that the components require to reach the column exit [13]. This can be either pre-computed
or related to the output and/or control horizon during the design of the
control policies. Here we examine both cases and we demonstrate the evolution
of the time delay with respect to both the output and the control horizon. It
can be observed that both strategies are equally effective, however the second
case allows greater freedom in the controller design as the setpoints are tracked
independently from the time delay. The suggested strategy can efficiently track
the desired outputs and retain the process under optimal operating conditions.
The designed controllers guarantee stable, cyclic operation and the system time
delay is successfully eliminated.

Acknowledgements

Financial support
from the European Commission (OPTICO/G.A. No.280813) is gratefully acknowledged.

References

[1]          S.
Nilchan and C. Pantelides, "On the optimisation of periodic adsorption
processes," Adsorption, vol. 4, pp. 113-147, 1998.

[2]          Y.
Kawajiri and L. T. Biegler, "Optimization strategies for simulated moving
bed and PowerFeed processes," AIChE Journal, vol. 52, pp.
1343-1350, 2006.

[3]          C.
Grossmann, G. Ströhlein, M. Morari, and M. Morbidelli, "Optimizing model
predictive control of the chromatographic multi-column solvent gradient
purification (MCSGP) process," Journal of Process Control, vol. 20,
pp. 618-629, 2010.

[4]          P.
Suvarov, A. Kienle, C. Nobre, G. De Weireld, and A. Vande Wouwer, "Cycle
to cycle adaptive control of simulated moving bed chromatographic separation
processes," Journal of Process Control, vol. 24, pp. 357-367, 2//
2014.

[5]          S.
Li, L. Feng, P. Benner, and A. Seidel-Morgenstern, "Using surrogate models
for efficient optimization of simulated moving bed chromatography," Computers
& Chemical Engineering,
vol. 67, pp. 121-132, 8/4/ 2014.

[6]          S.
Liu, A. S. Simaria, S. S. Farid, and L. G. Papageorgiou, "Optimising
chromatography strategies of antibody purification processes by mixed integer
fractional programming techniques," Computers & Chemical
Engineering,
vol. 68, pp. 151-164, 9/4/ 2014.

[7]          L.
Aumann and M. Morbidelli, "A continuous multicolumn countercurrent solvent
gradient purification (MCSGP) process," Biotechnology and
Bioengineering,
vol. 98, pp. 1043-1055, 2007.

[8]          E.
N. Pistikopoulos, N. A. Diangelakis, R. Oberdieck, M. M. Papathanasiou, I.
Nascu, and M. Sun, "PAROC?An integrated framework and software platform
for the optimisation and advanced model-based control of process systems,"
Chemical Engineering Science, p. In press.

[9]          M.
M. Papathanasiou, F. Steinebach, G. Stroehlein, T. Müller-Späth, I. Nascu, R.
Oberdieck, et al., "A control strategy for periodic systems -
application to the twin-column MCSGP," in Computer Aided Chemical
Engineering
, ed, 2015, p. accepted for publication.

[10]        M.
Krättli, F. Steinebach, and M. Morbidelli, "Online control of the
twin-column countercurrent solvent gradient process for
biochromatography," Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 1293, pp.
51-59, 6/7/ 2013.

[11]        D.
Angeli, R. Amrit, and J. B. Rawlings, "On average performance and
stability of economic model predictive control," Automatic Control,
IEEE Transactions on,
vol. 57, pp. 1615-1626, 2012.

[12]        R.
Huang, E. Harinath, and L. T. Biegler, "Lyapunov stability of economically
oriented NMPC for cyclic processes," Journal of Process Control, vol.
21, pp. 501-509, 4// 2011.

[13]        G.
Guiochon, "Basic principles of chromatography," Ullmann's
Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry,
2012.