(644h) Offset-Free Koopman-Based Model Predictive Control of a Batch Pulp Digester
AIChE Annual Meeting
2021
2021 Annual Meeting
Computing and Systems Technology Division
Predictive Control and Optimization
Thursday, November 11, 2021 - 5:43pm to 6:02pm
Meanwhile, recent studies have revealed that microscopic characteristics of fibers such as porosity, cell wall thickness (CWT), and fiber length considerably affect the properties of paper products. Hence, a multiscale modeling framework, which integrates the extended Purdue model and the kinetic Monte Carlo (kMC) model, has been suggested to capture the evolution of both macroscopic and microscopic characteristics during the pulping process [5]. Based on this framework, futher studies have been carried out to consider the influence of fiber collapse and breakage phenomena, and fiber-to-fiber heterogeneity on delignification rate and fiber attributes [6-8]. However, due to the high computational cost, it is challenging to directly implement these high-fidelity multiscale models to the model-based controller to regulate desired pulp properties.
To this end, a reduced-order model was derived via extended dynamic mode decomposition (EDMD), which is one of the most commonly used Koopman operator-based data-driven model identification methods for controlled systems [9,10] due to its capability of providing a reliable linear representation for nonlinear systems that enables the utilization of established control methods for linear systems. However, the inherent plant-model mismatch in EDMD due to the finite-dimensional approximation of the infinite-dimensional Koopman operator degrades the closed-loop performance of model-based control systems. To overcome such limitation, an offset-free control framework that compensates for the influence of plant-model mismatch and disturbances using the disturbance model was designed [11,12]. Subsequently, the designed offset-free Koopman-based model predictive control system was implemented to a batch pulp digester to obtain the desired Kappa number and the CWT value. Consequently, the closed-loop numerical experiment demonstrated that the developed control system is able to drive the Kappa number and CWT to the set-points under plant-model mismatch and additional disturbance.
REFERENCES
[1] Wisnewski, P. A., Doyle III, F. J., & Kayihan, F. (1997). Fundamental continuousâpulpâdigester model for simulation and control. AIChE journal, 43(12), 3175-3192.
[2] Bhartiya, S., Dufour, P., & Doyle III, F. J. (2003). Fundamental thermalâhydraulic pulp digester model with grade transition. AIChE journal, 49(2), 411-425.
[3] Lee, J. H., & Datta, A. K. (1994). Nonlinear inferential control of pulp digesters. AIChE journal, 40(1), 50-64.
[4] Kesavan, P., Lee, J. H., Saucedo, V., & Krishnagopalan, G. A. (2000). Partial least squares (PLS) based monitoring and control of batch digesters. Journal of Process Control, 10(2-3), 229-236.
[5] Choi, H. K., & Kwon, J. S. I. (2019). Multiscale modeling and control of Kappa number and porosity in a batchâtype pulp digester. AIChE Journal, 65(6), e16589.
[6] Choi, H. K., & Kwon, J. S. I. (2019). Modeling and control of cell wall thickness in batch delignification. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 128, 512-523.
[7] Choi, H. K., & Kwon, J. S. I. (2020). Multiscale modeling and multiobjective control of wood fiber morphology in batch pulp digester. AIChE Journal, 66(7), e16972.
[8] Son, S. H., Choi, H. K., & Kwon, J. S. I. (2020). Multiscale modeling and control of pulp digester under fiber-to-fiber heterogeneity. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 143, 107117.
[9] Williams, M. O., Kevrekidis, I. G., & Rowley, C. W. (2015). A dataâdriven approximation of the koopman operator: Extending dynamic mode decomposition. Journal of Nonlinear Science, 25(6), 1307-1346.
[10] Korda, M., & MeziÄ, I. (2018). Linear predictors for nonlinear dynamical systems: Koopman operator meets model predictive control. Automatica, 93, 149-160.
[11] Pannocchia, G., & Bemporad, A. (2007). Combined design of disturbance model and observer for offset-free model predictive control. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 52(6), 1048-1053.
[12] Maeder, U., Borrelli, F., & Morari, M. (2009). Linear offset-free model predictive control. Automatica, 45(10), 2214-2222.