Page 18 - LOPC Survey
P. 18

4.  Do you generally include premature/spurious (not related to overpressure per se) opening of
                   relief devices as scenario initiating causes?
                       a.  Yes, under all circumstances (11, 14.3%)
                       b.  Yes, but only if the release is not contained/treated (e.g., flare) (20, 26%)
                       c.  No (34, 44.2%)
                       d.  Sometimes (10, 13.0%)
                       e.  Only in specific services (2, 2.6%)

                   Comments
                   Almost half the respondents do not consider relief discharge as a scenario.

               5.  Do you generally  include  opening of  drain or vent lines during facility operation as scenario
                   initiating causes (e.g., by human error, by a valve failing open, or by leak-through of a valve)?
                       a.  Yes (48, 62.3%)
                       b.  No (8, 10.4%)
                       c.  Sometimes (18, 23.4%)
                       d.  Only in specific services.  (3, 3.9%)


                   Comments
                   A much higher percentage of respondents are concerned about drains and/or vents as compared
                   to relief discharges.

               6.  How do you generally identify and evaluate scenarios relating to external forces from unintended
                   mechanical impact (e.g., forklifts, vehicles, cranes, loss of piping support, etc.), or damage from
                   ill-advised  use  of  mechanical  force  to  address  operability  issues  (e.g.,  hammering  on  solids
                   handling  equipment),  impacting  the  primary  containment  system  and  causing  loss  of
                   containment?
                       a.  They are specifically excluded from our HIRAs/PHAs. (14, 18.2%)
                       b.  They are included, with standard default values used for the likelihood of occurrence. (7,
                          9.1%)
                       c.  They  are  included  if  specific  external  force(s)  are  identified  that  are  relevant  to  the
                          process being studied. (31, 40.3%)
                       d.  For every node or segment being studied, we use a checklist of possible external forces
                          to help identify ones that are relevant to the node or segment (5, 6.5%)
                       e.  It is included as a part of the Facility Siting study (9, 11.7%)
                       f.  Other (10, 13%)


                   Comments
                   As with previous answers, many who exclude it from HIRA address it through their Asset Integrity
                   program.


                         AIChE 2023. All rights reserved. Reproduction for non-commercial, educational purposes is encouraged.
                      However, reproduction for any commercial purpose without express written consent of AIChE is strictly prohibited.
                                                             18
   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23