(677c) Wet Metal-Support Interfaces Control Paths of H2 and O2 Activation over Au Nanoparticles
AIChE Annual Meeting
2023
2023 AIChE Annual Meeting
Catalysis and Reaction Engineering Division
Fundamentals of Catalysis and Surface Science III: Catalysis over Metals
Thursday, November 9, 2023 - 8:36am to 8:54am
Figure 1a shows that rates of H2 activation are 1-2 orders of magnitude greater on Au nanoparticles supported on metal oxides (e.g., TiO2) compared to more inert materials like carbon and BN, suggesting oxygen functions (e.g., O-H) assist HâH activation. Similarly, basic and reducible metal oxides (e.g., Au-La2O3) favor OâO bond cleavage (16-22 kJ mol-1), while more inert and acidic interfaces (e.g., Au-SiO2) obstruct OâO dissociation (72-85 kJ mol-1) and improve selectivity to H2O2. Moreover, H2O2 selectivities increase as the fraction of sites at the Au-support interface decrease relative to metallic sites far from this interface, improving H2O2 selectivity on larger Au nanoparticles (2-25 nm).
Figure 1b shows that rates of H2O2 formation increase linearly with H2 pressure and are independent of O2 pressure on Au-TiO2, suggesting O2-derived species saturate active sites. Moreover, rates of HD scrambling are one order of magnitude lower than rates of H2O2 formation, indicating irreversible adsorption and activation of H2 and D2. Such findings agree with decreased oxygen reduction rates when using D2 instead of H2 (kH/kD = 1.5), implicating kinetically relevant HâH dissociation during H2O2 formation. Still, Figure 1c shows that H2O2 only forms within protic solvents, indicating H2O2 forms by proton transfer steps. Yet, rates are equal within H2O and D2O, implying proton transfer is kinetically irrelevant. These findings suggest that solid-liquid-support interfaces catalyze proton-electron transfer reactions of H2, O2, and H2O, limited by HâH activation steps.