(658a) On Integration of Feedback Control and Safety Systems for Networked Chemical Processes
AIChE Annual Meeting
2018
2018 AIChE Annual Meeting
Computing and Systems Technology Division
Complex and Networked Chemical and Biochemical Systems
Thursday, November 1, 2018 - 12:30pm to 12:49pm
Motivated by the above considerations, we propose a distributed MPC design for chemical process networks that accounts for the activation of the safety system and changes the process model when the safety system is predicted to be activated at some time instant along the prediction horizon. An example of a continuous stirred-tank reactor (CSTR) coupled with a flash drum separator is considered to illustrate that model predictive control with varying models can control a process when the safety system is activated due to significant feed disturbances that lead to thermal runaway in the CSTR. This multi-unit chemical process is simulated in Aspen Plus Dynamics and a multi-variable distributed MPC is implemented to control the entire chemical process network as well as design and size the safety system. Disturbance and device failures are introduced to evaluate the distributed MPC performance for the cases in which it does and does not account for the activation of the safety system.
[1] The 100 largest losses 1974-2015: Large property damage losses in the hydrocarbon industry. Technical report, Marsh & McLennan Companies Inc., 2016.
[2] Center for Chemical Process Safety. Guidelines for Hazard Evaluation Procedures. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New Jersey, 2008.
[3] Zhang, Z., Z. Wu, H. Durand, F. Albalawi and P. D. Christofides, "On Integration of Feedback Control and Safety Systems: Analyzing Two Chemical Process Applications,'' Chem. Eng. Res. & Des., 132, 616-626, 2018.