(655e) Homogeneous Bubble Nucleation in Liquid Carbon Dioxide from a Hybrid of Molecular Dynamics Simulation and Density Gradient Theory
Another method used for studies of nucleation in literature10,11 is density functional theory (DFT) or simplifications thereof like the density gradient theory (DGT) first applied by Cahn and Hilliard to droplet nucleation in demixing incompressible liquids12. DFT and DGT have the advantage of correct limiting behavior approaching both binodal and spinodal. They do also inherently consider the size dependence of surface tension. Using full DFT, however, the free energy of the heterogeneous system must be known as a functional of density, which is most often not the case. Also, both theories only give information on the thermodynamic barrier, but not on the kinetics of bubble nucleation. This is usually addressed by using expressions for the kinetic pre-factor obtained in the framework of CNT. This may be dangerous, since CNT is usually developed for describing the whole process so that using only the pre-exponential factor of CNT may lead to poor results. We propose here a different method with a clean separation between kinetics and thermodynamics.
In order to properly introduce kinetics into the DGT based nucleation model, we hybridize it with molecular simulation. As an example, CO2 is studied. All our computations are based on the molecular model of Merker et al.13 of CO2. The thermodynamic and interfacial properties of this model are used to fit the parameters of the PC-SAFT14 equation of state (EOS), as well as the influence parameter from DGT. This way, a thermodynamic link between molecular simulation and thermodynamic model is achieved, which is further confirmed by comparison to molecular simulation data in the metastable range. In a next step, the homogeneous bubble nucleation of the molecular model is simulated for two temperatures using molecular dynamics simulation following an approach first introduced by Yasuoka and Matsumoto15 for droplet nucleation and later on applied by Diemand et al.16 for bubble nucleation. The kinetic pre-factor of the proposed hybrid theory is then fit to the direct simulation data at two temperatures, where we assume an Arrhenius type dependence on temperature. This way, our hybrid method describes bubble nucleation in the whole metastable range from triple point to critical point without relying on any further assumptions. The results compare favorably to our direct simulations of the nucleation rates and to available experimental data for CO217,18, while CNT shows the wrong temperature dependence and is off several orders of magnitude in terms of nucleation rates.
(1) Blander, M.; Katz, J. L. The Thermodynamics of Cluster Formation in Nucleation Theory. J Stat Phys 1972, 4 (1), 55â??59.
(2) VehkamÃ¤ki, H. Classical Nucleation Theory in Multicomponent Systems; Springer: Heidelberg, 2006.
(3) Blander, M.; Katz, J. L. Bubble Nucleation in Liquids. AIChE J. 1975, 21 (5), 833â??848.
(4) Baidakov, V. G.; Bobrov, K. S. Spontaneous Cavitation in a Lennard-Jones Liquid at Negative Pressures. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2014, 140 (18), 184506.
(5) Gonzalez, M. A.; Abascal, J. L. F.; Valeriani, C.; Bresme, F. Bubble Nucleation in Simple and Molecular Liquids via the Largest Spherical Cavity Method. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2015, 142 (15), 154903.
(6) RÃ¶mer, F.; Kraska, T. Homogeneous Nucleation and Growth in Supersaturated Zinc Vapor Investigated by Molecular Dynamics Simulation. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2007, 127 (23), 234509.
(7) Sinha, S.; Bhabhe, A.; Laksmono, H.; WÃ¶lk, J.; Strey, R.; Wyslouzil, B. Argon Nucleation in a Cryogenic Supersonic Nozzle. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2010, 132 (6), 64304.
(8) RÃ¶mer, F.; Fischer, B.; Kraska, T. Investigation of The Nucleation and Growth of Methanol Clusters from Supersaturated Vapor by Molecular Dynamics Simulations. Soft Materials 2012, 10 (1â??3), 130â??152.
(9) Wedekind, J.; HyvÃ¤rinen, A.-P.; Brus, D.; Reguera, D. Unraveling the ``Pressure Effectâ??â?? in Nucleation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 101 (12), 125703.
(10) Laaksonen, A.; Talanquer, V.; Oxtoby, D. W. Nucleation: Measurements, Theory, and Atmospheric Applications. Annual Review of Physical Chemistry 1995, 46 (1), 489â??524.
(11) Oxtoby, D. W. Density Functional Methods in the Statistical Mechanics of Materials. Annual Review of Materials Research 2002, 32 (1), 39â??52.
(12) Cahn, J. W.; Hilliard, J. E. Free Energy of a Nonuniform System. III. Nucleation in a Twoâ?Component Incompressible Fluid. The Journal of Chemical Physics 1959, 31 (3), 688â??699.
(13) Merker, T.; Engin, C.; Vrabec, J.; Hasse, H. Molecular Model for Carbon Dioxide Optimized to Vapor-Liquid Equilibria. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2010, 132 (23), 234512.
(14) Gross, J.; Sadowski, G. Perturbed-Chain SAFT: An Equation of State Based on a Perturbation Theory for Chain Molecules. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2001, 40 (4), 1244â??1260.
(15) Yasuoka, K.; Matsumoto, M. Molecular Dynamics of Homogeneous Nucleation in the Vapor Phase. I. Lennard-Jones Fluid. The Journal of Chemical Physics 1998, 109 (19), 8451â??8462.
(16) Diemand, J.; AngÃ©lil, R.; Tanaka, K. K.; Tanaka, H. Direct Simulations of Homogeneous Bubble Nucleation: Agreement with Classical Nucleation Theory and No Local Hot Spots. Phys. Rev. E 2014, 90 (5), 52407.
(17) Straub, J. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Chemical Thermodynamics and Physico-Chemical Techniques at High Temperatures, Baden, Austria; Butterworth: London, 1973; Vol. 2.
(18) Huang, J. S.; Goldburg, W. I.; Moldover, M. R. Observation of Anomalously Large Supercooling in Carbon Dioxide. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1975, 34 (11), 639â??642.