(547f) Gas-Liquid Mass Transfer Enhancement By Catalyst Particles, a Modelling Study Conference: AIChE Annual MeetingYear: 2015Proceeding: 2015 AIChE Annual MeetingGroup: Catalysis and Reaction Engineering DivisionSession: Multiphase Reaction Engineering II Time: Wednesday, November 11, 2015 - 2:10pm-2:30pm Authors: Wenmakers, P. W. A. M., DSM Hoorn, J. A. A., DSM Kuipers, H. J. A. M., Eindhoven University of Technology Deen, N. G., Eindhoven University of Technology Gas-liquid mass transfer enhancement by catalyst particles, a modelling study P.W.A.M. Wenmakers1, J.A.A. Hoorn1, J.A.M. Kuipers2, N.G. Deen2,*1 DSM Ahead, Advanced Chemical Engineering Solutions (ACES), P. O. Box 18, 6160 MD Geleen, The Netherlands2 Multiphase Reactors Group, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands*Corresponding author: N.G.Deen@tue.nl In chemical industry the importance of multiphase reactors is eminent already for decades. Still today there are enough challenges left to further improve performance of these reactors to maintain profitability and also to meet more strict (future) environmental targets. Especially for reactor systems in large bulk chemical plants every small fraction in reactor performance increase can be a substantial overall improvement. Not only in increased reactor yield as such but also separation downstream can be positively affected. Studies to support the fundamental understanding of the mechanisms taking place in the reactors and at the same time extending engineering skills are still very worthwhile to do. One of the more complicated multiphase systems is the so-called gas-liquid-solid reactor where gaseous and liquid components are allowed to react by means of a solid (supported) catalyst. A proper understanding of the hydrodynamics, mass transfer, heat transfer, and kinetics is required for the proper design of such a reactor. For slurry reactors, where the small catalyst particles are dispersed throughout the liquid phase, the gas to liquid mass transfer is one of the critical design parameters. It is known that the rate of gas-liquid mass transfer can be significantly influenced by the presence of small (catalyst) particles in the liquid phase, either being gas-absorbing or reactive catalyst particles 1-6. The small particles near the gas-liquid interface can reduce the concentration of the dissolved gaseous component, thus increasing the driving force for mass transfer. Depending on the lyophobicity the particles can actually adhere to the gas-liquid interface7-9, reducing the diffusion distance. The enhancement of mass transfer due to catalyst particles has already been discussed in a number of papers, typically using a continuum approaches. Also, if internal diffusion limitation for the catalyst is taken into account this is typically done via the effectiveness factor approach. However, none of these models takes into account concentration inhomogeneities due to the presence of the catalyst particles in space nor the effect of diffusion limitation within the catalyst particle itself. In this study, the gas-liquid mass transfer enhancement was studied using 3D unsteady state simulations. The diffusion of the gaseous component through a suspension of catalyst particles has been studied for different cases, viz. what is the effect of: 1) Particle orientation: Randomly distributed particles throughout the liquid versus closely packed particles near the gas-liquid interface. 2) Catalyst particle diameter 3) Catalyst particle concentration 4) Rate of reaction, this also directly relates to the degree of internal diffusion limitation. 5) Gas-liquid diffusivity. In addition to the 3D simulations a homogeneous model was derived which takes into account the effect of the catalyst particles and of internal diffusion limitation on the rate of gas-liquid mass transfer through the gas-liquid interface. The results of the homogenous model have been compared to those of the 3D simulations. The results of the 3D simulations show that the enhancement factor increases with increasing catalyst concentration and increasing rate of reaction, as expected. As the particle diameter is increased, the enhancement factor decreases due to an increasing degree of diffusion limitation. The results of the homogeneous model match with the results of the numerical simulations within a 10% error. Therefore it is concluded that the significantly less complex and time consuming homogeneous model can be used to predict the enhancement of the mass transfer due to the presence of catalytic particles. References: 1. Wimmers OJ, Paulussen R, Vermeulen DP, Fortuin JMH. Enhancement of absorption of a gas into a stagnant liquid in which a heterogeneously catalysed chemical reaction occurs. Chemical Engineering Science. 1984;39:1415-1422. 2. Wimmers OJ, Fortuin JMH. The use of adhesion of catalyst particles to gas bubbles to achieve enhancement of gas absorption in slurry reactors?II. Determination of the enhancement in a bubble-containing slurry reactor. Chemical Engineering Science. 1988;43:313-319. 3. Ramachandran PA. Gas Absorption in Slurries Containing Fine Particles:â?? Review of Models and Recent Advances. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2007;46:3137-3152. 4. Holstvoogd RD, van Swaaij WPM, van Dierendonck LL. The absorption of gases in aqueous activated carbon slurries enhanced by adsorbing or catalytic particles. Chemical Engineering Science. 1988;43:2181-2187. 5. Holstvoogd RD, Van Swaaij WPM. The influence of adsorption capacity on enhanced gas absorption in activated carbon slurries. Chemical Engineering Science. 1990;45:151-162. 6. Ruthiya KC, van dS, Kuster BFM, Schouten JC. Model To Describe Mass-Transfer Enhancement by Catalyst Particles Adhering to a Gasâ?'Liquid Interface. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2005;44:6123-6140. 7. Omota F, Dimian AC, Bliek A. Adhesion of solid particles to gas bubbles. Part 1: Modelling. Chemical Engineering Science. 2006;61:823-834. 8. Wimmers OJ, Fortuin JMH. The use of adhesion of catalyst particles to gas bubbles to achieve enhancement of gas absorption in slurry reactors?I. Investigation of particle-to-bubble adhesion using the bubble pick-up method. Chemical Engineering Science. 1988;43:303-312. 9. Verrelli DI, Koh PTL, Nguyen AV. Particle?bubble interaction and attachment in flotation. Chemical Engineering Science. 2011;66:5910-5921.