(285b) Rational Design of a Metallic Electrocatalyst for the Selective Reduction of CO2 to C2+ Oxygenates Conference: AIChE Annual MeetingYear: 2015Proceeding: 2015 AIChE Annual MeetingGroup: Catalysis and Reaction Engineering DivisionSession: Electrocatalysis and Photoelectrocatalysis V Time: Tuesday, November 10, 2015 - 8:50am-9:10am Authors: Clark, E. L., Joint Center for Artificial Photosynthesis, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Kwon, Y., Joint Center for Artificial Photosynthesis, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Cheng, M. J., Joint Center for Artificial Photosynthesis, Lawerence Berkeley National Lab Lobaccaro, P., Joint Center for Artificial Photosynthesis, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Lum, Y., Joint Center for Artificial Photosynthesis, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Singh, M. R., Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Bell, A. T., University of California, Berkeley The promise of utilizing solar energy to promote the electrochemical or photoelectrochemical reduction of CO2 to transportation fuels has motivated extensive research efforts aimed at identifying highly active and selective CO2 reduction (CO2R) electrocatalysts.1–4 These efforts have revealed that copper is the only metallic electrocatalyst capable of reducing CO2 to hydrocarbons and alcohols.5–7 Unfortunately, the reaction requires an overpotential of approximately -1 V, resulting in a cathodic CO2R energy efficiency of roughly 25%.8–11 Furthermore, CO2R over metallic copper can produce up to 16 different products depending on the surface morphology and the applied potential.10,11 As a consequence, there is considerable motivation to discover novel electrocatalysts that can reduce CO2 to fuels with higher efficiency and selectivity than metallic copper. Highly disordered metallic electrocatalysts have been shown to dramatically reduce the overpotential requirement of CO2R over Sn,12 Cu,13 Au,14 and Ag15 electrodes. The enhanced activity of these electrocatalysts is presumably due to the presence of stepped facets and grain boundaries at the electrode surface.16 Unfortunately these highly activity electrocatalysts almost exclusively produce carbon monoxide and formate, which are not typically regarded as fuels. Recently, copper nanoparticles supported on glassy carbon were shown to selectively reduce CO2 to methane with Faradaic efficiencies as high as 75% at an applied potential of -1.4V vs RHE.17 Furthermore, cycling the potential of a polycrystalline copper electrode in a halogenated electrolyte prior to conducting CO2R has been shown to result in surface nanostructuring that enhances the selectivity to ethene production.11,18–20 However, there have been no reports in the literature of electrocatalysts that can selectively reduce CO2 to C2+ oxygenates, which are widely regarded as more effective transportation fuels than the hydrocarbon products. Unfortunately, the lack of understanding of the reaction mechanism that leads to C-C coupling makes it difficult to design such an electrocatalyst. Interestingly, highly disordered Cu electrodes have been reported to reduce CO to C2+ oxygenates with high selectivity at low overpotential.21 However, the efficacy of this electrocatalyst is extremely limited due to the use of CO as the reacting species, which limits the C2+ oxygenate partial current density to ~0.4 mA/cm2. Herein we report the rational design of a metallic CO2 electrocatalyst that produces C2+ oxygenates as the primary reaction products. The novel electrocatalyst concept is supported by DFT calculations which help to explain the origin of this electrocatalysts unique selectivity. References 1. Jitaru, M., Lowy, D. A., Toma, M., Toma, B. C. & Oniciu, L. Electrochemical Reduction of Carbon Dioxide on Flat Metallic Cathodes. 27, 875–889 (1997). 2. Gattrell, M., Gupta, N. & Co, A. A Review of the Aqueous Electrochemical Reduction of CO2 to Hydrocarbons at Copper. J. Electroanal. Chem. 594, 1–19 (2006). 3. Hori, Y. in Mod. Asp. Electrochem. 89–189 (2008). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-49489-0_3 4. Whipple, D. T. & Kenis, P. J. A. Prospects of CO2 Utilization via Direct Heterogeneous Electrochemical Reduction. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 1, 3451–3458 (2010). 5. Hori, Y., Kikuchi, K. & Suzuki, S. Production of CO and CH4 in Electrochemical Reduction of CO2 at Metal Electrodes in Aqueous Hydrogencarbonate Solution. Chem. Lett. 1695–1698 (1985). 6. Noda, H. et al. Electrochemical Reduction of Carbon Dioxide at Various Metal Electrodes in Aqueous Potassium Hydrogen Carbonate Solution. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 63, 2459–2462 (1990). 7. Hori, Y., Wakebe, H., Tsukamoto, T. & Koga, O. Electrocatalytic Process of CO Selectivity in Electrochemical Reduction of CO2 at Metal Electrodes in Aqueous Media. Electrochim. Acta 39, 1833–1839 (1994). 8. Hori, Y., Murata, A. & Takahashi, R. Formation of Hydrocarbons in the Electrochemical Reduction of Carbon Dioxide at a Copper Electrode in Aqueous Solution. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1 85, 2309–2326 (1989). 9. Peterson, A. A., Abild-Pedersen, F., Studt, F., Rossmeisl, J. & Nørskov, J. K. How Copper Catalyzes the Electroreduction of Carbon Dioxide into Hydrocarbon Fuels. Energy Environ. Sci. 3, 1311–1315 (2010). 10. Kuhl, K. P., Cave, E. R., Abram, D. N. & Jaramillo, T. F. New Insights into the Electrochemical Reduction of Carbon Dioxide on Metallic Copper Surfaces. Energy Environ. Sci. 5, 7050–7059 (2012). 11. Tang, W. et al. The Importance of Surface Morphology in Controlling the Selectivity of Polycrystalline Copper for CO2 Electroreduction. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 14, 76–81 (2012). 12. Chen, Y. & Kanan, M. W. Tin Oxide Dependence of the CO2 Reduction Efficiency on Tin Electrodes and Enhanced Activity for Tin/Tin Oxide Thin-Film Catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 1986–1989 (2012). 13. Li, C. W. & Kanan, M. W. CO2 Reduction at Low Overpotential on Cu Electrodes Resulting from the Reduction of Thick Cu2O Films. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 7231–7234 (2012). 14. Chen, Y., Li, C. W. & Kanan, M. W. Aqueous CO2 Reduction at Very Low Overpotential on Oxide-Derived Au Nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 19969–19972 (2012). 15. Lu, Q. et al. A Selective and Efficient Electrocatalyst for Carbon Dioxide Reduction. Nat. Commun. 5, 3242 (2014). 16. Feng, X., Jiang, K., Fan, S. & Kanan, M. W. Grain-Boundary-Dependent CO2 Electroreduction Activity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 4606–4609 (2015). 17. Manthiram, K., Beberwyck, B. J. & Alivisatos, A. P. Enhanced Electrochemical Methanation of Carbon Dioxide with a Dispersible Nanoscale Copper Catalyst. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 13319–13325 (2014). 18. Bugayong, J. & Griffin, G. L. Electrochemical Reduction of CO2 Using Supported Cu2O Nanoparticles. ECS Trans. 58, 81–89 (2013). 19. Chen, C. S. et al. Stable and Selective Electrochemical Reduction of Carbon Dioxide to Ethylene on Copper Mesocrystals. Catal. Sci. Tecnol. 5, 161–168 (2014). 20. Roberts, F. S., Kuhl, K. P. & Nilsson, A. High Selectivity for Ethylene from Carbon Dioxide Reduction over Copper Nanocube Electrocatalysts. Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 54, 5179–5182 (2015). 21. Li, C. W., Ciston, J. & Kanan, M. W. Electroreduction of Carbon Monoxide to Liquid Fuel on Oxide-Derived Nanocrystalline Copper. Nature 508, 504–507 (2014).