(501f) Conversion of Residual Ethylene Oxide in the Ionic Liquid Catalyzed CO2 Cycloaddition Process | AIChE

(501f) Conversion of Residual Ethylene Oxide in the Ionic Liquid Catalyzed CO2 Cycloaddition Process

Authors 

Sun, J. - Presenter, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Zhang, J., Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Cheng, W., Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Wang, J., Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Zhang, S., State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Complex Systems, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences



Conversion of residual ethylene
oxide in the ionic liquid catalyzed CO2 cycloaddition process

Jian Sun, Weiguo Cheng, Jinquan Wang, Junping Zhang
and Suojiang Zhang

Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese
Academy of Sciences,
100190, Beijing, PR China

*Contact information: jsun@home.ipe.ac.cn

Recently, the synthesis of
cyclic carbonates via cycloaddition of CO2 to epoxides is much attractive
not only because of its efficiency in CO2 conversion, but also becuase
of its widely derivative high-value chemicals.[1] Although a number
of efficient catalysts including ionic liquids (ILs) have been developed, [2]
attention on the trace residual epoxide in the reaction system, especially in gas
phase, is rarely covered, which could cause a potential explosion of epoxide
when unreacted CO2 is compressed for recyle. As a continous work for
CO2 conversion,[3] herein, studies on the conversion of
residual trace epoxide (0.2 wt%) in an IL catalyzed CO2 cycloaddition
process to produce ethylene carbonate (EC) were carried out. The effect parameters
including pressure, temperature, time and solvents (e.g. H2O, EC+ethylene
glycol+H2O, BmimCl, BmimPF6, BmimBF4, etc) were
systematically screened, and a >99.9% conversion of EO could be realized by
reduding the partial pressure of EO in the system. The results indicated that a
vapor-liquid equilibriuma of EO in the reaction system has a more important effect
on EO elimination rather than reaction time and temperature.

Refferences

[1]  B.
Schaffner, F. Schaffner, S.P. Verevkin and A. Borner, Chem. Rev., 2010, 110,
4554.

[2]  a)
J. M. Zhang, J. Sun, X. C. Zhang, Y. S. Zhao, S. J. Zhang. Greenhouse Gas Sci Technol.,
2011, 2:142-159; b) M. North, R. Pasquale, C. Young, Green Chem., 2010, 12,
1514.

[3]  a)
J.Q. Wang, J. Sun, W.G Cheng, S.J. Zhang. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2012, 14,
11021; b) J. Sun, L. J. Han, W. G. Cheng , J. Q. Wang, X. P. Zhang, S. J.
Zhang. ChemSusChem, 2011, 4: 502; c) J. Sun, J.Q. Wang, W. G. Cheng,
J. X. Zhang, X. H. Li, S. J. Zhang, Y. B. She. Green Chem., 2012, 14:
654; d) J. Sun, W. G. Cheng, W. Fan, Y. H. Wang, Z. Y. Meng, S. J. Zhang. Catal.
Today
, 2009, 148: 361.

Acknowledgments

This
work was supported by National
Basic Research
Program of China (2009CB219901), and National Science Fund of China (21006117).