(557a) Microwave Synthesis Engineering - the Effect of Frequencuy and Power Delivery | AIChE

(557a) Microwave Synthesis Engineering - the Effect of Frequencuy and Power Delivery

Authors 

Tompsett, G. A. - Presenter, University of Massachusetts-Amherst
Panzarella, B. - Presenter, University of Massachusetts Amherst
Pratt, M. N. - Presenter, University of Massachusetts
Czabaj, B. - Presenter, University of Massachusetts - Amherst
Conner, W. C. - Presenter, University of Massachusetts-Amherst


Microwaves have been shown to
enhance the reaction rates and selectivities on products for organic1 and inorganic2,3 syntheses.  The microwave synthesis of nanoporous materials, including zeolites was recently reviewed by Tompsett et al.3, in which the various mechanisms of reaction rate enhancement were discussed.  The reason for these enhancements has been attributed to both thermal and non-thermal effects.

It is known that the dielectric
properties of materials are dependant on the frequency of the applied
electromagnetic field.  However, very little work has been reported on the
effect of microwave frequency on chemical reaction.  This is likely due to the
availability of systems with frequencies other than the standard 2.45 GHz. 
Only recently, has work started to appear that considers the effect of
frequency.  For example, Conde et al.4-7 showed that frequency effects play an important role in the catalytic oligomerization of methane.  In 2004, Caponetti et al.8 investigated the effect of microwave frequency on the synthesis of CdS. They found that at 12 GHz larger particle size distribution of CdS was formed compared to 18, 8, 2.45 and 2.85 GHz. However, they used different vessel sizes at the different frequencies, which likely influenced the synthesis under microwaves as shown by Conner et al.9

Malinger et
al.10 studied the microwave synthesis of manganese oxides using a variable frequency microwave oven.  They found that manganese oxide (OMS-2) prepared at 5.5 GHz showed the highest catalytic conversion rate for the oxidation of 2-thiophenemethanol.  Also, OMS-2 synthesized at high microwave frequency 5.5 GHz, had a different morphology than OMS-2 synthesized at low microwave frequency (2.45 GHz). OMS-2 synthesized at high microwave frequency is composed of both small fibers (<100 nm in length) and fibers of a size typical of OMS-2.

The frequency dependence and the influence
of power delivery method on the yield and crystallinity of zeolite synthesis
were determined for NaY (FAU) and silicalite (MFI) zeolites.  Two methods of
microwave heating were investigated, namely waveguide cavities at fixed
frequencies and a variable frequency oven. Waveguides at frequencies at 2.45,
5.8 and 10 GHz were used to heat precursor solutions to reaction temperatures
of 100°C and 150°C respectively.  NaY and silicalite showed negligible
difference in percent crystallinity over this frequency range however,
silicalite showed some decrease in yield at higher frequency.  A Teflon vessel
with either 11 mm or 33 mm inside diameter was used for reactions in order to
determine the effect of reactor geometry at differing frequencies on the
formation of silicalite.  Table 1 shows the results at two frequencies (2.45
and 5.8 GHz) and two reactor geometries.  It can be seen that a higher yield is
produced in the 33 mm reactor at both frequencies.  Also, insignificant
difference in the yield is observed for the two frequencies for the same
reactor.  In this range, it can be concluded that microwave frequency has
little effect on the formation of silicalite, however, lower average power was
used at 5.8 GHz, likely due to better coupling of the microwaves.  This holds
for longer reaction times at the two frequencies.

A variable frequency microwave
oven system (Lambda Technologies) was used to syntheses silicalite at fixed
frequencies 3 and 5.5 GHz as well as with sweeping frequency mode between 3 and
5.5 GHz.  It was found that higher yields and larger crystals formed for
reactions at 175°C for 15 minutes, in the same reaction vessel.

The method of power delivery
during microwave heating is dependant on the oven system employed.  Typically,
a duty cycle pulse is used to maintain the temperature; however, newer
laboratory models operate on a more continuous or cycled power.  The average
field intensity and duration on steps of the hydrothermal formation of zeolites
will provide evidence of the impotence of the microwave field over purely
thermal effects on the reaction processes.

Using the waveguide systems, the
effect of power delivery on the synthesis of silicalite was also investigated. 
Preliminary results show that silicalite prepared with continuous microwave
field at 2.45 GHz produced larger and fewer crystals compared to pulsed
experiments, where the ratio of power on and off was 1/3.  The power delivery
may effect to the nucleation and growth of silicalite zeolite. 

Table 1 Yield of silicalite from microwave synthesis
at 150°C for two different frequencies.

Frequency (GHz)

2.45

5.8

2.45

5.8

2.45

5.8

Reaction vessel

11 mm

11 mm

33 mm

33 mm

33 mm

33 mm

Ramp (min)

4

4

4

4

4

4

Hold (min)

40

40

40

40

55

55

 

Ave Power (W)

68.1

38.3

86.8

33.8

78.6

36.9

 

Yield

2.6%

3.5%

21.9%

24.6%

34.2%

31.0%

Yield (g)

0.021

0.029

0.180

0.202

0.281

0.255

 

References

                (1)           de la Hoz, A.; Diaz-Ortiz, A.;
Moreno, A. Chemical Society Reviews 2005, 34, 164.

                (2)           Cundy, C. S. Collection of
Czechoslovak Chemical Communications
1998, 63, 1699.

                (3)           Tompsett, G.; Panzarella, B.;
Conner, W. C.; Lu, F.; Yngvesson, K. S. Submitted to Review of Scientific
Instruments
2006.

                (4)           Conde, L. D.; Marun, C.; Suib,
S. L.; Fathi, Z. Journal of Catalysis 2001, 204, 324.

                (5)           Conde, L. D.; Marun, C.; Suib,
S. L.; Fathi, Z. Preprints of Symposia - American Chemical Society, Division
of Fuel Chemistry
2002, 47, 273.

                (6)           Conde, L. D.; Suib, S. L. Journal
of Physical Chemistry B
2003, 107, 3663.

                (7)           Conde, L. D.; Suib, S. L. ACS
Symposium Series
2003, 852, 325.

                (8)           Caponetti, E.; Pedone, L.;
Massa, R. Materials Research Innovations 2004, 8, 44.

                (9)           Conner, W. C.; Tompsett, G.;
Lee, K.-H.; Yngvesson, K. S. Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2004,
108, 13913.

                (10)         Malinger, K. A.; Ding, Y.-S.;
Sithambaram, S.; Espinal, L.; Gomez, S.; Suib, S. L. Journal of Catalysis
2006, 239, 290.