Lifecycle Physical Hazards of Polystyrene Foam Board

  • Type:
    Conference Presentation
  • Conference Type:
    AIChE Spring Meeting and Global Congress on Process Safety
  • Presentation Date:
    March 21, 2010
  • Skill Level:
  • PDHs:

Share This Post:

Once the content has been viewed and you have attested to it, you will be able to download and print a certificate for PDH credits. If you have already viewed this content, please click here to login.
Polymer Foam Boards have been widely used for individual home and general building, from roofs and/or walls down to foundation, for example. On the other hand, these Boards have significant physical hazards, because flammable blowing agent has come to be used, replacing nonflammable CFC chemicals due to their global warming potential. Moreover foamed polymer itself is combustible. Hence it is necessary for Polymer Foam Boards to contain sufficient amount of retardants, with additional countermeasures to prevent fire. This paper presents lifecycle physical hazards of Polystyrene Foam Board, where brominated retardants and blowing agents are used. Firstly, these hazards are identified based on actual Polymer Foam incident/accident records in Japan. Secondly, these records were analyzed, and possible incident scenarios for Polystyrene Foam Boards were extracted based on their lifecycle flow. Thirdly, blowing gas from 2 kinds of Foams, EPS and XPS, heated at 50°C and 70°C for 1 hour,were detected by gas chromatography, while incident/accident records did not refer to Polystyrene Foam types. The results are concluded that exhaustive ignition source management is necessary for Polystyrene Foam Boards handling, while air ventilation to flammable gas is essential at indoor storage sites and/or underground construction sites.



Do you already own this?

Log In for instructions on accessing this content.


AIChE Member Credits 0.5
AIChE Members $15.00
AIChE Undergraduate Student Members Free
AIChE Graduate Student Members Free
Non-Members $25.00