(711a) Energy-Efficient Virus Removal with Cotton-Based DIY Water Filters
AIChE Annual Meeting
2020
2020 Virtual AIChE Annual Meeting
Sustainable Engineering Forum
Green Chemistry and Engineering-I
Tuesday, November 17, 2020 - 8:00am to 8:15am
In this work, we show that a simple filter made with unprocessed cotton balls functionalized with Moringa oleifera (MO) seed proteins can effectively capture viruses. Cationic proteins from MO seeds have been studied in relevance to indigenous water purification since 19799. Using MS2 bacteriophage as a surrogate virus for EVs, we showed that the proposed filters can achieve ~7 log10 removal of viruses, far exceeding the environmental protection agency requirements of 4 log10 virus removal10. In addition, we compared the proposed MO-Cotton filters to commercially available UF and NF membranes to show that MO-Cotton filters can achieve effective virus removal with significantly low-energy requirement. Due to the cost-effective and chemical-free design we believe that MO-Cotton filters can be a potential solution for viral contamination of water worldwide.
References:
(1) Troeger, C.; Forouzanfar, M.; Rao, P. C.; Khalil, I.; Brown, A.; Reiner Jr, R. C.; Fullman, N.; Thompson, R. L.; Abajobir, A.; Ahmed, M. Estimates of global, regional, and national morbidity, mortality, and aetiologies of diarrhoeal diseases: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. The Lancet Infectious Diseases 2017, 17, 909-948.
(2) Organization, W. H. Global networks for surveillance of rotavirus gastroenteritis, 2001-2008. Weekly Epidemiological Record= Relevé épidémiologique hebdomadaire 2008, 83, 421-425.
(3) Yahya, M.; Cluff, C.; Gerba, C. Virus removal by slow sand filtration and nanofiltration. Water Science and Technology 1993, 27, 445-448.
(4) Shirasaki, N.; Matsushita, T.; Matsui, Y.; Yamashita, R. Evaluation of the suitability of a plant virus, pepper mild mottle virus, as a surrogate of human enteric viruses for assessment of the efficacy of coagulationârapid sand filtration to remove those viruses. Water research 2018, 129, 460-469.
(5) Kumar, M.; Adham, S.; DeCarolis, J. Reverse osmosis integrity monitoring. Desalination 2007, 214, 138-149.
(6) Alzahrani, S.; Mohammad, A. W. Challenges and trends in membrane technology implementation for produced water treatment: A review. Journal of Water Process Engineering 2014, 4, 107-133.
(7) Gilman, R. H.; Skillicorn, P. Boiling of drinking-water: can a fuel-scarce community afford it? Bulletin of the World Health Organization 1985, 63, 157.
(8) Richardson, S. D.; Plewa, M. J.; Wagner, E. D.; Schoeny, R.; DeMarini, D. M. Occurrence, genotoxicity, and carcinogenicity of regulated and emerging disinfection by-products in drinking water: a review and roadmap for research. Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research 2007, 636, 178-242.
(9) Jahn, S. A.; Dirar, H. Studies on natural water coagulants in the Sudan, with special reference to Moringa oleifera seeds. Water Sa 1979, 5, 90-106.
(10) USEPA: Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule Toolbox Guidance Manual. USEPA, Office of Water Washington, 2010.