(570d) Optimal Solvent Selection in Co-Solvent-Based Biomass Conversion Processes | AIChE

(570d) Optimal Solvent Selection in Co-Solvent-Based Biomass Conversion Processes


Karacasulu, K. - Presenter, RWTH Aachen University
Kabatnik, C., RWTH Aachen University
Scheffczyk, J. D., Institute of Technical Thermodynamics
Bardow, A., RWTH Aachen University
Viell, J., RWTH Aachen
Mitsos, A., RWTH Aachen University
The replacement of fossil-based products by renewables will require advanced processes with high economic and ecological performance. To that end, a promising option is to use gamma-valerolactone (GVL), a biomass-derived solvent, to solubilize all fractions of lignocellulosic biomass. This approach was successfully used to produce soluble carbohydrates, levulinic acid, and furfural [1,2,3]. To separate GVL effectively, a co-solvent can be used to switch the miscibility of the system by lowering the temperature inside the process. Thereby, the carbohydrates are immediately separated in an aqueous stream, while the GVL is recycled back to the reactor [4]. The resulting aqueous stream is then further deprived of GVL in a separation section, including an extraction and distillation column [5]. A key to unlock the potential of such a process lies in the right (co-)solvent choice. Today, the solvent selection is still mainly conducted experimentally and decoupled from process design.

In this work, we combine computational and experimental methods to increase the molecular set of co-solvent candidates and simultaneously decrease the manual effort to conduct experiments, compared to conventional solvent selection. A quantum mechanical approach [6] to predict physical properties allows us to investigate a broad range of molecules. Integration of reduced-order process models [7,8], embedded in an optimization, enables evaluation of each solvent candidate on the minimal process operating costs. Also, environmental, health, and safety (EHS) [9] are evaluated. The suggested approach allows us to identify the co-solvent, leading to the best process performance from over 4 600 molecules. We test the best system experimentally for the co-solvent hydrolysis reaction and confirm the predicted phase compositions through IR spectroscopy. The results show toluene and ethylbenzene as promising co-solvents. Ethylbenzene shows a lower experimental extraction efficiency than toluene and would not be a leading candidate when the choice is solely based on experimental evaluation. We show that ethylbenzene is even better than the conventionally selected toluene with operating costs savings of 15% and a lower EHS score. The presented approach allows the rapid in silico assessment of a large number of co-solvents on the process level and therefore balances the trade-offs leading to optimal process performance.

[1] J. S. Luterbacher, J. M. Rand, D. M. Alonso, J. Han, J. T. Youngquist, C. T. Maravelias, B. F. Pfleger and J. A. Dumesic, Nonenzymatic Sugar Production from Biomass Using Biomass-Derived γ-Valerolactone, Science, 2014, 343, 277–280.
[2] S. G. Wettstein, D. M. Alonso, Y. Chong and J. A. Dumesic, Production of levulinic acid and gamma-valerolactone (GVL) from cellulose using GVL as a solvent in biphasic systems, Energy Environ. Sci., 2012, 5, 8199–8203.
[3] D. M. Alonso, S. G. Wettstein and J. A. Dumesic, Gamma-valerolactone, a sustainable platform molecule derived from lignocellulosic biomass, Green Chem., 2013, 15, 584–595.
[4] A. H. Motagamwala, W. Won, C. T. Maravelias and J. A. Dumesic, An engineered solvent system for sugar production from lignocellulosic biomass using biomass derived gamma-valerolactone, Green Chem., 2016, 18, 5756–5763.
[5] W. Won, A. H. Motagamwala, J. A. Dumesic and C. T. Maravelias, A co-solvent hydrolysis strategy for the production of biofuels: process synthesis and technoeconomic analysis, React. Chem. Eng., 2017, 2, 397–405.
[6] A. Klamt, Conductor-like Screening Model for Real Solvents: A New Approach to the Quantitative Calculation of Solvation Phenomena, J. Phys. Chem., 1995, 99, 2224–223.
[7] J. Bausa, R. v. Watzdorf and W. Marquardt, Shortcut methods for nonideal multicomponent distillation: I. Simple columns, AIChE J., 1998, 44, 2181– 2198.
[8] C. Redepenning, S. Recker and W. Marquardt, Pinch-based shortcut method for the conceptual design of isothermal extraction columns, AIChE J., 2017, 63, 1236– 1245.
[9] D. Prat, A. Wells, J. Hayler, H. Sneddon, C. R. McElroy, S. Abou-Shehada and P. J. Dunn, CHEM21 selection guide of classical- and less classical-solvents, Green Chem., 2016, 18, 288–296.