A global DDoS attack has been intermittently affecting many websites globally. You may not have a problem accessing AIChE's sites, but in case you do, please contact Customer Service during normal business hours.

Fellow Nomination FAQs

Browse the questions below to find out more about the AIChE Fellows nomination procedure.

Fellow Nomination and Application


Nomination Sponsors:

Professional Accomplishment:

Service to the Profession:

Q1: Who can nominate someone for the grade of Fellow?

A: Any Member in good standing, except Student Members. However, supporting letters must come from either Senior Members or Fellows and no more than two should come from the same entity (also see Q6). Self-nomination is not allowed.

Q2: Who can be nominated for the grade of Fellow?

A: Any Senior Member in good standing who has the credentials for Fellow as established in the AIChE bylaws. [Note: if the Fellow nominee is not a Senior Member at the time of nomination the application for Senior Membership should be submitted at the same time as the Fellow Nomination]

Q3: I would like to nominate a prominent chemical engineer who is not a member of AIChE. What steps should I take?

A: AIChE has no way of recognizing an individual who is not an AIChE member through an Associate Fellow or Honorary Fellow designation.

The Fellow Grade is meant to honor and reward AIChE members for their accomplishments and service. The current requirements are 10 years of AIChE membership including being a Senior Member (see also Q2. Given these requirements the nominee would need to apply for membership as a Senior Member and then a Fellow nomination could be made after the10 year membership requirement has been met. Both professional accomplishments and service to the profession are required for the grade of Fellow.

Q4: My Nominee has less than 25 years experience but has considerable professional accomplishments and service to the profession. What guidance can you offer?

A: Candidates with exemplary professional accomplishments or service with less than 25 years’ experience should provide details on the depth and breadth of the accomplishments. In general, if a candidate has accomplished what might normally take 25 years in less time, the details must be provided to demonstrate such accomplishments. The accomplishments or service must be significant, show leadership and have made an impact.

Q5: What guidance can you give regarding the resume used to support the nomination?

A: A well-constructed resume is a valuable addition to the nomination package and can be very helpful to the nominator in completing the Nomination Form. However, the resume should not be used as a substitute for the Nomination Form as resumes are not usually constructed to address the requirements for establishing that a nominee meets the specific criteria for the grade of Fellow. Additionally, many academic resumes, and some non-academic ones, have much material (publication lists or detailed descriptions of each industrial assignment, for example) with little bearing on establishing the credentials for Fellow. It is for this reason that the resume must be limited to five pages and should focus on providing supporting information to the documentation of accomplishments and service provided in the Nomination Form.

For instance, an extensive publication record should be summarized in such a way that it can support the documentation of professional accomplishments. Having many publications is not sufficient (a suitable summary might highlight publications in prestigious peer-reviewed journals and whether the publications have been recognized as having a significant impact on the field using Impact Factors and Citation Analysis). Likewise, listing attendance at international conferences, even as an invited speaker is not sufficient and the resume should detail why participation was considered a significant mark of professional recognition. For industrial nominations the resume should include details of the nominee’s span of control and budget authority.

Q6: I am having difficulty finding five sponsors who are either Fellows or Senior Members. What advice can you offer?

A: If a nominee can’t identify Senior Members or Fellows who are knowledgeable enough about the nominee’s career to be able to attest to professional accomplishments and/or service to the profession the nominator should contact the Admissions Committee to discuss the individual case as it may be acceptable to have testimonials of non-members.

Q7: Please provide some guidance as to what qualifies as “service to the profession” done for reasons other than financial compensation.

A: Service to the profession involves unpaid (volunteer) participation in the operation and/or governance of organizations that promote the societal benefits of chemical engineering. Please note, however, that merely being a member of an organization, or multiple organizations, is insufficient to count as “service to the profession”. As chemical engineering is a very diverse discipline, credit is given for service to AIChE as well as affiliated societies and trade groups, educational organizations and non-profits which support chemical engineers, and engineering in general. In cases where the service is unpaid but could be construed as being undertaken for professional advancement the burden lies in explaining the altruistic nature of the service. For example, in academia being a Student Advisor is often an assignment given to junior faculty and merely being a Student Advisor does not qualify as “service” unless the record of accomplishments in that position shows a level of engagement and commitment beyond what might be considered “usual”.

Go to Top

Q8: Please provide some guidance as to what qualifies as “service to the profession” in the context of engagement in AIChE activities.

A: Engagement in various AIChE operational areas such as Local Sections, Student Chapters, Divisions, Forums, Committees, Operating Councils, and Board are typically what qualifies as service to the profession; however, the service must make an impact and be in addition to what may be considered to be an essential part of what a person’s career demands. For example serving as a Student Chapter advisor may be a typical assignment for a junior faculty member, and participation in programming activities may be useful for promoting research activities and publication requirements. To meet the standard the candidate needs to have been seen to have been an active and engaged individual willing and able to take on assignments. Leadership roles with significant accomplishments are a plus, and longevity on a committee requires that the member be active, not just a member.

Q9: I gather a nominee must have outstanding professional accomplishments or service to the profession. What guidance can you provide for documenting outstanding” professional accomplishments”?

A: The initiator should use a chronological sequence to complete the nomination form listing career titles and service roles and durations. Titles such as Senior Director, Vice President or Senior Process or Project Manager of a large department may indicate the level of accomplishment or service if the organization is a major corporation or technical society but for mid-sized or small companies it is necessary to describe the financial and managerial span of control to document the degree of accomplishment. Candidates that do not have managerial or financial responsibility, such as sales or marketing roles or technical professionals should list accomplishments and impact to the company and any awards or recognition that was received.  In an academic environment the candidate would have a tenured position and be recognized as a senior faculty member who has made considerable contributions to the development and stature of the department in which s/he serves. Similar considerations would apply for both State and Federal government entities. Sponsor letters should include specific reference to the candidate’s accomplishments and their impact to augment the information on the nomination form.

Q10: I gather a nominee must have outstanding professional accomplishments or service to the profession. What guidance can you provide for documenting outstanding” service to the profession”?

A: “Outstanding” service is achieved through active volunteer engagement with an organization at a level where the candidate’s contributions can be judged as making a significant impact on the organizations operation and/or mission. In the context of AIChE a Local Section Officer having a documented record of growing or improving the operation of the Section would be considered “outstanding” service. However, simply being a long-term member or even an officer of a Local Section would not, by itself, qualify. The same considerations would apply to Forums, Committees, Divisions and Operating Councils.

Go to Top

Q11:I am having difficulty finding sponsors from different organizations to meet the requirement of having only two from the same entity. What advice can you offer?

A: The main purpose of the sponsor letters is to verify the accomplishments and service noted in the nomination form. If more than two letters are required from the same organization, feel free to provide them. However, it is important to get at least three other letters from individuals from other organizations as the Admission Committee believes that a nominee with outstanding accomplishments and/or service must have interacted with chemical engineers outside of his own organization. If meeting these requirements is still an issue, please contact the Admissions Committee to discuss the situation. 

Q12: My Nominee is an AIChE Senior Member but resides outside of the US and has had little opportunity to participate in AIChE meetings. What advice can you offer for activities that support “service to the profession”?

A: Although service to AIChE is preferred, consideration is given to service to other organizations that promote the chemical engineering profession. This may be the local professional chemical engineering society or other non-profit organization that promotes science and engineering. 

Go to Top

Q13: The AIChE Bylaws mention the emblem of Fellow? What is this and when is it awarded?

A: A Fellows lapel pin looks like the old AIChE logo with FELLOW written above. It is often presented with a certificate either at the Fellows breakfast or at a Fellow’s local section meeting.

Q14: What happens after one submits an application package?

A: You will receive notice that an application has been received that is deemed acceptable for review or you will be notified of deficiencies (e.g., not enough letters, lack of signatures, etc.). The Admissions Committee generally meets early in December, June, March, and September. To be reviewed adequately an acceptable nomination package needs to be in approximately 30 days before each meeting. Following each meeting you will either receive notice that the Committee has reported your nomination(s) out to the AIChE Board of Directors along with the Admissions Committee’s recommendation , or you will receive specific requests for more information. Only after the Board of Directors (or its Executive Board) meets and considers the Admissions Committee’s recommendation will you receive information as to acceptance or rejection. If you receive a request for more information on the application after the Admissions Committee meets you should reply in as complete a fashion as possible and submit well before the next Committee meeting so that the applicant’s review can be completed.

Go to Top